+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare

Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare

Archives of Internal Medicine 162(7): 757-765

Background: Since 1972, Medicare beneficiaries have had the option of enrolling in a Medicare-qualified health maintenance organization (HMO). Little information exists to inform beneficiaries' choices between the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare program and an HMO. Objectives: To compare the primary care received by seniors in Medicare HMOs with that of seniors in the traditional FFS Medicare program, and among HMOs, and to examine performance differences associated with HMO model-type and profit status. Methods: Data were derived from a cross-sectional observational survey of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older in the 13 states with mature, substantial Medicare HMO markets. Only beneficiaries continuously enrolled for 12 months or more in traditional FFS Medicare or a qualified Medicare HMO were eligible. Data were obtained using a 5-stage protocol involving mail and telephone (64% response rate). Analyses included respondents who identified a primary physician and had all required data elements (N=8828). We compared FFS and HMO performance on 11 summary scales measuring 7 defining characteristics of primary care: (1) access, (2) continuity, (3) integration, (4) comprehensiveness, (5) "whole-person" orientation, (6) clinical interaction, and (7) sustained clinician-patient partnership. Results: For 9 of 11 indicators, performance favored traditional FFS Medicare over HMOs (P<.001). Financial access favored HMOs (P<.001). Preventive counseling did not differ by system. Network-model HMOs performed more favorably than staff/group-model HMOs on 9 of 11 indicators (P<.001). Few differences were associated with HMO profit status. Conclusions: The findings are consistent with previous comparisons of indemnity insurance and network-model and staff/group-model HMOs in elderly and nonelderly populations. The stability of results across time, geography, and populations suggests that the relative strengths and weaknesses of each system are enduring attributes of their care. Medicare enrollees seem to face the perennial cost-quality trade-off: that is, deciding whether the advantages of primary care under traditional FFS Medicare are worth the higher out-of-pocket costs.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 011197360

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11926848

Related references

Medicare Program; Contract Year 2019 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage, Medicare Cost Plan, Medicare Fee-for-Service, the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs, and the PACE Program. Final rule. Federal Register 83(73): 16440-16757, 2018

Health characteristics of Medicare traditional fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage enrollees: 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey linked to 2007 Medicare data. National Health Statistics Reports 2012(53): 1-12, 2012

Medicare program; establishment of an expedited review process for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in health maintenance organizations, competitive medical plans, and health care prepayment plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period. Federal Register 62(83): 23368-23376, 1997

Comparing the Health Care Experiences of Medicare Beneficiaries with and without Depressive Symptoms in Medicare Managed Care versus Fee-for-Service. Health Services Research 51(3): 1002-1020, 2016

Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program; Accountable Care Organizations--Revised Benchmark Rebasing Methodology, Facilitating Transition to Performance-Based Risk, and Administrative Finality of Financial Calculations. Final rule. Federal Register 81(112): 37949-38017, 2016

Medicare Advantage, accountable care organizations, and traditional Medicare: synchronization or collision?. Yale Journal of Health Policy Law and Ethics 15(1): 37-55, 2015

Medicare program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations. Final rule. Federal Register 76(212): 67802-67990, 2011

Patient satisfaction among elderly enrollees and disenrollees in Medicare health maintenance organizations. Results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation. JAMA 262(1): 57-63, 1989

Comparing traditional Medicare and managed care Medicare. Home Healthcare Nurse 17(4): 220-225, 1999

The quality of ambulatory care in Medicare health maintenance organizations. American Journal of Public Health 80(4): 411-415, 1990

Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional coverage: perceptions of health care among beneficiaries with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82(8): 1009-1017, 2001

Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care. JAMA 291(14): 1744-1752, 2004

Quality Assessments by Sick and Healthy Beneficiaries in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Managed Care. Medical Care 47(8): 882-888, 2009

Quality assessments by sick and healthy beneficiaries in traditional Medicare and Medicare managed care. Medical Care 47(8): 882-888, 2009

Medicare program; Medicare secondary payer for individuals entitled to Medicare and also covered under group health plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period. Federal Register 60(169): 45344-45372, 1995