EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
47,893,527
Abstracts:
28,296,643
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Taxonomic affinities of the Eppelsheim femur


, : Taxonomic affinities of the Eppelsheim femur. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 119(4): 297-304

The taxonomic affinities of the Eppelsheim femur, known as Paidopithex, have been unclear for more than a century. Over the years, due to similarities with Pliopithecus, some authors have considered it a large pliopithecid, while others refer to it as Dryopithecus. The issue could not be resolved, because no definitive Dryopithecus femora were available. With the discovery of the Dryopithecus laietanus skeleton from Can Llobateres (CLl 18800), it has become possible to test the attribution of the Eppelsheim femur to Dryopithecus on the basis of direct morphological and metrical comparisons. By means of allometric techniques, we show that the Eppelsheim and D. laietanus femora fit different hindlimb morphologies with regard to relative length and relative head/neck size, with Paidopithex significantly differing from Dryopithecus, but more closely resembling Pliopithecus. Paidopithex also differs from Dryopithecus in other important aspects, such as its lower neck/shaft angle, lack of elevation of the femoral head above the greater trochanter, more posteriorly oriented lesser trochanter, and proximal shaft diameter thicker anteroposteriorly than mediolaterally. In these features, Paidopithex most closely resembles Pliopithecus in spite of differences in body mass (ca. 22 kg vs. ca. 10 kg, respectively). These features suggest that Paidopithex used a primitive locomotor pattern associated with arboreal quadrupedalism, instead of the more derived pattern displayed by Dryopithecus. Currently available evidence confirms that the attribution of Paidopithex to Dryopithecus can be rejected. Paidopithex could be a large and otherwise unknown pliopithecid, but the possibility cannot be ruled out that it represents a third kind of catarrhine.

Accession: 011454222

PMID: 12448015

DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10140

Download PDF Full Text: Taxonomic affinities of the Eppelsheim femur


Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:
Close
Close

Related references

Franzen, Jens Lorenz., 2000: Getting to the bottom of the primeval Rhine - excavations at Eppelsheim Auf dem Grunde des Urrheins - Ausgrabungen bei Eppelsheim. Natur und Museum (Frankfurt am Main). Juni; 1306: 169-180

Curnoe, D.; Ji, X.; Liu, W.; Bao, Z.; Taçon, P.S.C.; Ren, L., 2016: A Hominin Femur with Archaic Affinities from the Late Pleistocene of Southwest China. The number of Late Pleistocene hominin species and the timing of their extinction are issues receiving renewed attention following genomic evidence for interbreeding between the ancestors of some living humans and archaic taxa. Yet, major gaps in...

Morton, C.M.; Karol, K.G.; Chase, M.W., 1997: Taxonomic affinities of Physena and Asteropeia. Asteropeia and Physena are both enigmatic woody dicotyledons from Madagascar. Various taxonomic affinities have been suggested for both genera, but no consensus has been reached. An analysis of rbcL sequence data strongly supports recognition of t...

Kramer Andrew, 1984: The evolutionary and taxonomic affinities of Meganthropus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 63(2): 179-180

Lavarack, P.S., 1976: The taxonomic affinities of the australian neottioideae. The taxonomic affinities of the Neottioideae (Orchidaceae) and, in particular, that of its Australian members, was examined, employing numerical taxonomic methods. Two analyses were carried out; the 1st, discussed only briefly, involved a sample o...

Conran J.G.; Clifford H.T., 1985: The taxonomic affinities of the genus ripogonum. The genus Ripogonum J. R. et G. Frost, is usually included in either the Smilacaceae or Liliaceae, but it has been accorded family rank. A numerical taxonomic study of the phenetic relationships of Ripogonum and all genera of the Smilacaceae, Dios...

Rozendaal, Fg, 1989: Taxonomic affinities of Bradypterus montis. Dutch Birding 11(4): 164-167

Rosas, A.; Bermudez D.C.stro, J.M.ria, 1998: On the taxonomic affinities of the Dmanisi Mandible. The recent discovery of unexpectedly ancient human remains has fuelled interest about the first dispersion of Homo outside Africa. The Dmanisi mandible is perhaps one of the most interesting findings, as it supposedly represents one of the oldest...

Petersen F.P.; Fairbrothers D.E., 1980: Taxonomic affinities of leitneria floridana. The University Of British Columbia Second International Congress Of Systematic And Evolutionary Biology, Vancouver, B C , Canada, July 17-24, I+441p University Of British Columbia: Vancouver, B C , Canada Paper : p307

Rosas, A.; Bermúdez de Castro, J.M., 1998: On the taxonomic affinities of the Dmanisi mandible (Georgia). The recent discovery of unexpectedly ancient human remains has fuelled interest about the first dispersion of Homo outside Africa. The Dmanisi mandible is perhaps one of the most interesting findings, as it supposedly represents one of the oldest...