+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The Hong Kong index of dyspepsia: A validated symptom severity questionnaire for patients with dyspepsia

The Hong Kong index of dyspepsia: A validated symptom severity questionnaire for patients with dyspepsia

Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 17(5): 545-551

Aim: Locally validated symptom questionnaires are essential instruments in dyspepsia research. A symptom score for Chinese dyspeptics was developed. Multiple aspects of validity and reliability were assessed. Methods: Sixty-five patients with endoscopy-negative dyspepsia and 65 healthy controls were presented with a list of 24 previously determined common abdominal symptoms and asked to rate the severity in a five point Likert scale. Comprehensibility and relevance of symptoms were assessed. The questionnaire was administered 3 h later to assess for reproducibility. A locally validated Short Form-36 quality-of-life questionnaire was also administered. Cisapride 5 mg thrice daily was prescribed to dyspeptic patients but not to the controls. The dyspepsia symptom and SF-36 questionnaires were repeated after 3 weeks for patients under treatment. Global change in symptoms and the need for further medical care were assessed. Concept, content, construct and criterion validity, consistency and reproducibility of the dyspepsia symptom questionnaire were assessed. Results: All items were considered comprehensible by more than 90% of subjects. Relevance of individual symptoms to dyspeptic patients ranged from 10.8-76.9%. Twelve items were selected by logistic regression to account for most of the differences between control and dyspeptic patients. Test-retest reproducibility and internal consistency were good with the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.90. A cut-off score of equal to or greater than 16 was determined to discriminate between controls and dyspeptic patients. The dyspepsia score correlated negatively with all domains of the SF-36 quality of life scale except physical functioning. The dyspepsia questionnaire also discriminated between patients who reported a subjective improvement in symptoms and those who reported no change or worsening. Conclusions: The dyspepsia symptom index was easy to understand, internally consistent and reproducible. It predicted global symptom change, and the symptom severity scores correlated negatively with quality of life.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011468910

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12084027

DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02713.x

Related references

Patient-based assessment in dyspepsia: development and validation of Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI). Digestive Diseases and Sciences 45(6): 1172-1179, 2000

Validation of a modified version of SODA questionnaire (severity of dyspepsia assessment) adapted to Peru for evaluating evolution of symptoms severity in patients with dyspepsia. Revista de Gastroenterologia del Peru 33(1): 9, 2014

A questionnaire to assess symptom severity in patients with functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 116(4 Part 2): A1010, 1999

The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: A valid tool for measuring the presence and severity of dyspepsia. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 12(12): 1257-1262, 1998

The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: a valid tool for measuring the presence and severity of dyspepsia. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 12(12): 1257-1262, 1998

Measuring dyspepsia: a new severity index validated in Bologna. Digestive and Liver Disease 36(12): 806-810, 2004

W1070 Estimation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (Mcid) for the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (Ndi), a Validated Quality of Life (Qol) Scale for Functional Dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 134(4): A-627, 2008

Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6: 12, 2008

Development and validation of the dyspepsia symptom severity index. Gastroenterology 116(4 Part 2): A74, 1999

Classification of dyspepsia: Identification of independent symptom components in 7270 consecutive, unselected dyspepsia patients from general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 33(12): 1262-1272, 1998

In patients with functional dyspepsia, overlapping of dyspepsia subgroups is a marker for severity. Gastroenterology 118(4 Suppl 2 Part 2): AGA A1246, 2000

Incidence of gastroesophageal malignancy in patients with dyspepsia in Hong Kong: implications for screening strategies. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 54(4): 454-458, 2001

A validated dyspepsia symptom score. Italian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 29(6): 495-500, 1997

Quality of life in South East Asian patients who consult for dyspepsia: validation of the short form Nepean Dyspepsia Index. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 7: 45, 2009

Diagnostic value of a validated questionnaire for dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 114(4 Part 2): A294-A295, 1998