+ Translate

The crisis in local institutional review boards

, : The crisis in local institutional review boards. Annals of Internal Medicine 136(5): 410-1; Author Reply 410-1

(PDF 0-2 workdays service)

Accession: 011486204

PMID: 11874318

Submit PDF Full Text: Here

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:

Related references

Burman, W., J.; Reves, R., R., 2002: The crisis in local institutional review boards: In response. Annals of Internal Medicine 136(5): 411

Levine, R.J., 2001: Institutional review boards: a crisis in confidence. Annals of Internal Medicine 134(2): 161-163

Hendrix, T.R., 1977: Local Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Medical Education 52(7): 604-606

Rickels, K., 1978: Importance of local review committees (institutional review boards) for the protection of experimental subjects. Monographien aus dem Gesamtgebiete der Psychiatrie 19: 94-112

Anonymous, 1982: Position statement of the AFCR on FDA proposal to assign scientific review of new drugs for human use to local institutional review boards. Clinical Research 30(1): 27-28

Rosé, C.D., 2003: Local vs central institutional review boards for multicenter studies. JAMA 290(16): 2126; Author Reply 2126-7

Clark, D.C., 2001: Variability among institutional review boards and the value of local research context. Critical Care Medicine 29(2): 444-445

Burman, W.J.; Schooley, R.T., 2001: The role of local institutional review boards in protecting human research subjects. JAMA 285(21): 2713-2713

Burman, W.J.; Reves, R.R.; Cohn, D.L.; Schooley, R.T., 2001: Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards. Clinical research has undergone remarkable and beneficial expansion in the past 25 years, but with this growth has come an unprecedented increase in workload for the human subjects protection system. Recently, a major change in federal oversight o...

Klitzman, R., 2014: How good does the science have to be in proposals submitted to Institutional Review Boards? An interview study of Institutional Review Board personnel. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been increasingly criticized for how they review protocols, but how IRBs perceive, and make decisions about, the quality of the science of protocols has not been examined. To explore how and when IRBs view a...