+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Urological medical malpractice

Urological medical malpractice

Journal of Urology 165(5): 1638-1642

Purpose: Like all other medical and surgical practitioners, urologists are occasionally confronted with the unpleasant realization that they are being sued for medical malpractice. These suits are generated through any number of acts or failures to act during innumerable circumstances. We reviewed all urological claims presented to 1 representative insurance company and delineated the types of acts, settings, expenses and disposition of these claims. This review was performed to understand better the claims confronting urologists and provide future guidance to urologists in the medical malpractice setting. Methods and Materials: Working with The St. Paul Companies 259 medical malpractice claims against urologists consecutively closed from 1995 to 1999 were reviewed. Claims were defined as urological malpractice when the insured-defendant in a malpractice claim was a urologist. Each claim was reviewed in terms of disposition, patient age, geographic location, office-hospital setting, purported negligent act, procedure if applicable, litigation status and expenses incurred. Data ascertained were then compared to national practice statistics provided by the American Urological Association (AUA) and American Medical Association. In addition, a literature search with the key words urology and malpractice was performed. Related pertinent documents were reviewed and incorporated into this analysis. Results: We reviewed 259 urological medical malpractice claims closed between 1995 and 1999. During this period The St. Paul Companies insured various numbers of private practice urologists. In the years ending 1995 to 1999, 489, 492, 438, 377 and 426 individual urologists, respectively, were insured with respective premiums paid in the amounts of dollar sign6.27, dollar sign6.23, dollar sign5.80, dollar sign5.15 and dollar sign3.87 million. Claims were analyzed by AUA section. The greatest incidence of claims occurred in the Southeastern section, followed by the North Central, South Central, Mid-Atlantic, New England, Western and New York sections. According to AUA statistics the greatest number of practicing urologists are in the Southeastern section, followed by the Western, North Central, South Central, Mid-Atlantic, New York, New England and Northeastern sections. When analyzing average expenses, the New England section had the most costly claims, followed by the Mid-Atlantic, North Central, Southeastern, South Central, Western and New York sections with respective mean expenses of dollar sign266,887, dollar sign145,031, dollar sign47,667, dollar sign41,843, dollar sign38,365, dollar sign30,037 and dollar sign1,065 per claim, respectively. The greatest percent of claims arose from the categories of inpatient, adult and surgical procedures. Endourological procedures resulted in the greatest incidence of surgical claims. However, claims related to prostatectomy involved the most expensive claims with a mean cost of dollar sign185,345. Of the surgical procedures incidents defined as postoperative complications were the most common acts of negligence generating a malpractice claim. The majority of malpractice claims were filed in court but subsequently voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. Conclusions: Medical malpractice persists as an issue confronting urologists. Urologists must strive to maintain open, honest, in-depth communications with their patients when occurrences with potential malpractice overtones arise.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011618784

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11342944

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66375-6

Related references

Medical malpractice trends in contemporary urological laparoscopy Results of an internet survey. Journal of Urology 171(4 Suppl.): 127, 2004

Penile prosthesis implantation compares favorably in malpractice outcomes to other common urological procedures: findings from a malpractice insurance database. Journal of Sexual Medicine 6(8): 2111-2114, 2009

Medical malpractice 2000. Malpractice from the viewpoint of expert witnesses if a malpractice insurance carrier. Versicherungsmedizin 53(3): 129-137, 2001

Perceptions of medical malpractice and medical malpractice reform among first- and fourth-year medical students. Health Policy 91(1): 71-78, 2009

New medicine for medical malpractice: the empirical truth about legislative initiatives for medical malpractice reform--Part I. Journal of Health and Hospital Law 27(9): 268-274, 1994

New medicine for medical malpractice: the empirical truth about legislative initiatives for medical malpractice reform--Part II. Journal of Health and Hospital Law 27(10): 306-312, 1994

Medical malpractice tort actions provide two benefits: compensation for the victim of medical malpractice, and a reminder to the health care profession of the legal consequences of negligence. Medicine and Health Rhode Island 83(11): 368, 2000

Observations on medical malpractice: insights from an in-depth study of medical malpractice case files. Maryland State Medical Journal 29(11): 58-61, 1980

A new day dawns for the fund: the governor's commission on medical malpractice rewrites the Medical Malpractice Act. Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 143(6): 31-35, 1991

Metagenomic Taxonomy-Guided Database-Searching Strategy for Improving Metaproteomic Analysis. Journal of Proteome Research 17(4): 1596-1605, 2018

Veterinary medical malpractice and medical malpractice: some parallels and differences. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 202(11): 1819-1820, 1993

What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice-substantial awards affirmed in medical malpractice case for death after caesarean section from delayed detection of intraperitoneal hemorrhage; in contrast to damages awarded for a motor vehicle accident, damages for medical accidents was estimated to be higher in this case on the basis of a decision on liability in claimant's favor. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 115(6): 343-344, 2015

Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions. Western Journal of Medicine 173(4): 244-250, 2000

Physicians' actions against medical malpractice suits: countersuit for legal malpractice. Journal of the National Medical Association 71(1): 99, 1979

The Harvard Medical Malpractice Study and the malpractice debate in New York State. Legal Medicine 1991: 111-125, 1991