A phase 2 dose-finding study of PEGylated recombinant methionyl human soluble tumor necrosis factor type I in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Furst, D.E.; Fleischmann, R.; Kopp, E.; Schiff, M.; Edwards, C.; Solinger, A.; Macri, M.

Journal of Rheumatology 32(12): 2303-2310

2005


ISSN/ISBN: 0315-162X
PMID: 16331754
Accession: 011700710

Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS

Article/Abstract emailed within 1 workday
Payments are secure & encrypted
Powered by Stripe
Powered by PayPal

Abstract
Objective. In a phase 2 study, to assess the efficacy and safety of pegsunercept, a soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods. Patients were randomized to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 6 1) or active drug [400 mu g/kg (n = 67) or 800 mu g/kg (n = 66)] for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Secondary efficacy measures included ACR50 and ACR70 responses, and changes in individual ACR components at Week 12. Safety assessments included summaries of adverse events including infectious episodes.Results. Treatment with pegsunercept resulted in a significantly higher ACR20 response at Week 12 in the 800 mu g/kg group (45%) compared with the placebo group (26%; p = 0.020). The treatment effect of pegsunercept (both doses) over the study period showed statistically significant improvement for most ACR components and health related quality of life, with the 800 mu g/kg group showing greater clinical improvements in efficacy measures. The overall incidence of adverse events and infectious episodes was similar among the treatment and placebo groups.Conclusion. In this 12 week dose-finding study of 194 patients, weekly subcutaneous dosing with pegsunercept showed beneficial effects in improving the signs and symptoms of RA. It appeared to be safe and well tolerated in this small number of patients. Significant clinical improvements were seen in patients in the 800 mu g/kg group; however, this dose may be suboptimal, and further evaluation of this product with higher doses or a more frequent dosing regimen is warranted.