+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting



A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting



Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 41(7): 1245-1258



A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of in vivo animal experiments carried out to inform human health was conducted to examine whether the reporting and methods used are of adequate quality to allow maximum use of the animal evidence to inform policy or decision-making. 103 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were identified, including 57 systematic reviews, 29 combined systematic review and meta-analysis, and 17 meta-analyses.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011712676

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16923604

DOI: 10.1080/10934520600655507


Related references

A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Animal Experiments with Guidelines for Reporting. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 41(7): 1245-1258, 2006

Effects of fixed orthodontic brackets on oral malodor: A systematic review and meta-analysis according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Medicine 97(14): E0233, 2018

Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). Rofo 183(12): 1106-1110, 2012

Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines. Journal of the Medical Library Association 105(3): 233-239, 2018

Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. Plos One 8(12): E83138, 2014

The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. International Journal of Surgery 12(12): 1262-1265, 2015

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1395, 2017

A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. Plos One 12(4): E0175213, 2017

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews 6(1): 194, 2018

Methodology and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in psychiatric epidemiology: systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry 200(6): 446-453, 2012

Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 2(3): 163-187, 2008

Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods 6(2): 175-187, 2016

Not All Systematic Reviews are Systematic: A Meta-review of the Quality of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure. Heart Lung & Circulation 22: S84-S85, 2013

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Pain Physician 12(5): 819-850, 2009

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 3: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials. Pain Physician 12(1): 35-72, 2009