+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Automatic segmentation as a tool for examining the handwriting process of children with dysgraphic and proficient handwriting

Automatic segmentation as a tool for examining the handwriting process of children with dysgraphic and proficient handwriting

Human Movement Science 25(4-5): 608-621

The purpose of this study was to use an x-y digitizer to collect handwriting samples typical of those written by the child in his or her natural environment, to analyze these samples with novel segmentation algorithms, and to present them visually in ways that illuminate spatial and temporal dynamic features amongst children with dysgraphic and proficient handwriting. While using the POET software (Penmanship Objective Evaluation Tool), a paragraph was copied onto paper affixed to an x-y digitizer by third-grade students, 14 with proficient and 14 with poor handwriting. A segmentation algorithm was developed to automatically isolate writing segments. Results yielded significant differences between the groups in various measures, including the number of the raw segments (i.e., the number of segments before combined with letters), the number of reverse segments (i.e., when the participant returned to correct or complete a previously written segment), the number of letters per minute, and the mean "In-Air" time between letters. Variability in both the spatial and temporal domains of instances of the same letter throughout the text was greater among the dysgraphic handwriters in comparison to the variability among the proficient. These results demonstrated the potential of using automated analytic techniques and visual display to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of handwriting difficulties.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011793499

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17011656

DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.005

Related references

Relationships among biomechanical ergonomic factors, handwriting product quality, handwriting efficiency, and computerized handwriting process measures in children with and without handwriting difficulties. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 60(1): 28-39, 2006

Lifts and stops in proficient and dysgraphic handwriting. Human Movement Science 33: 381-394, 2014

The relationship between the Evaluation Tool of Children's Handwriting and teachers' perceptions of handwriting legibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 55(5): 518-523, 2003

Validating the use of the evaluation tool of children's handwriting-manuscript to identify handwriting difficulties and detect change in school-age children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 66(4): 414-421, 2013

On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 104(3): E102-E111, 2011

Automated Detection of Children at Risk of Chinese Handwriting Difficulties Using Handwriting Process Information: An Exploratory Study. Ieice Transactions on Information and Systems E102.D(1): 147-155, 2019

Handwriting and perceptual-motor skills in clumsy, dysgraphic, and 'normal' children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75(3 Pt 2): 1207-1217, 1992

Improving handwriting without teaching handwriting: The consultative clinical reasoning process. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 52(3): 199-210, 2005

Use of modern cursive handwriting and handwriting speed for children ages 7 to 14 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills 82(1): 282, 1996

Computerized temporal handwriting characteristics of proficient and non-proficient handwriters. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 57(2): 129-138, 2003

Handwriting development in grade 2 and grade 3 primary school children with normal, at risk, or dysgraphic characteristics. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32(2): 540-548, 2011

Comprehension of handwriting development: Pen-grip kinetics in handwriting tasks and its relation to fine motor skills among school-age children. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 64(5): 369-380, 2017

Space time invariance in handwriting contrasts between primary school children displaying advanced or retarded handwriting acquisition. Human Movement Science 5(3): 275-296, 1986

A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities 26(10): 689-699, 1993

Handwriting movement analyses comparing first and second graders with normal or dysgraphic characteristics. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34(9): 2433-2441, 2013