+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer

Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 270(1): 25-30

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer and to compare surgical outcome and postoperative early and late complications with results of traditional laparotomy. Forty women with endometrial cancer underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Each patient operated by laparoscopy was matched by age, preoperative clinical stage and histology of the endometrial cancer with a patient treated by the same operation but using traditional laparotomy. Half of these patients underwent total pelvic lymphadenectomy and half had pelvic lymph node sampling. The groups were compared in clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, recoveries and early and late postoperative complications. The patients in the laparoscopy group had less blood loss, more lymph nodes removed, shorter hospital stay but longer operation time than those treated by laparotomy. Only one (2.5%) laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy due to pelvic adhesions. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Postoperative complications were more common (55.0%) in the laparotomy than in the laparoscopy group (37.5%). Only one major complication (2.5%) occurred among patients undergoing laparoscopy as compared with three (7.5%) major complications in the laparotomy group. Superficial wound infection was the most common (20%) infection in laparotomy patients while vaginal cuff cellulitis occurred in 10% of laparoscopy patients. Late (>42 days) postoperative complications were almost equally frequent (20.0 and 22.5%) in both groups. Lower extremity lymph edema or pelvic lymph cyst was found in 12.5% of all cases. As a result of surgical staging the disease of 6 women (15%) in both groups was upgraded. Laparoscopic surgery is a viable alternative to traditional surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. The surgical outcome is similar in both cases. In laparoscopic procedures the operation time is longer but the postoperative recovery time shorter than in laparotomy. Severe complications were limited in both groups, while wound infections can be avoided using laparoscopy.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011865536

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12728326

DOI: 10.1007/s00404-003-0488-7

Related references

Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 41(8): 1074-1081, 2015

Effect of surgeon's experience on the surgical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for women with endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 78(1): 58-61, 2000

Laparoscopic surgery compared to traditional abdominal surgery in the management of early stage cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 33(4): 395-398, 2012

Treatment of Early Stage Endometrial Cancer by Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparison Study. Medicine 95(14): E3211, 2016

The Oncologic Outcome and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Women with Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Results in Single Institution. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 20(6): S60-S61, 2013

Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 26(3): 539-546, 2016

Mo1763 - Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery for T4 Colon Cancer Compared to Open Surgery. Gastroenterology 154(6): S-1336-S-1337, 2018

Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 215(5): 588.E1-588.E7, 2016

Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 216(6): 619, 2017

A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients. Jsls 19(1): E2014.00001, 2016

Laparoscopic surgery in obese women with endometrial cancer. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 7(1): 83-88, 2000

Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer in overweight women. Minerva Ginecologica 63(4): 315-323, 2011

Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. Oncology 10(1): 44-52, 2009

Laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer: the learning curve. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 107(2): 195-200, 2003

Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of 626 Patients. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 58(9): 862-869, 2015