EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Community context of an obligate mutualism: Pollinator and florivore effects on Yucca filamentosa



Community context of an obligate mutualism: Pollinator and florivore effects on Yucca filamentosa



Ecology (Washington D C) 86(4): 905-913



Obligate pollination mutualisms have been central to our understanding of the ecology and evolution of mutualisms. Although usually viewed as pairwise interactions, obligate mutualists also interact with other community members that may impact the mutualism. In this study, we examined the community context of the obligate inutualism between the plant Yucca filamentosa and its yucca moth pollinator Tegeticula cassandra to determine the relationships among plant traits, the community assemblage, and fruit set. In addition to attracting its pollinator, Y. filamentosa in central Florida also attracts two insect florivores: the hemipteran Leptoglossus phyllopus and the beetle Hymenorus densus. We Surveyed flowering Y. filamentosa in 2001 and 2002 to determine the abundance of the three insect species throughout the flowering period. We also measured fruit set and four plant traits thought to be important in attracting the moth pollinator. Path analysis revealed that T. cassandra was the most important determinant of relative fruit set for both years. Peak pollinator abundance was significantly earlier than peak flowering. Consequently, we found a negative relationship between plant flowering date and pollinator abundance. Furthermore. taller plants also attracted more pollinators. Leptoglossus phyllopus had a significantly negative impact on relative fruit set in 2001 but not in 2002, whereas H. densus had no effect in either year. Abundance of the two florivores was more closely tied to peak flowering of Y. filamentosa than was the peak abundance of the pollinator moths. Although both florivore species reached high densities on Y. filamentosa, their effect on relative fruit set through floral abscission may be partially masked by the characteristically high abscission rates found in yuccas. As a result, florivores may be feeding on flowers that are already destined to be abscised. Similarly, pollinator moths may be preadapted to handle the effects of florivores because females lay eggs across multiple plants and flowers. Hence, the obligate mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths may be somewhat buffered from the effects of local community members depending on whether florivores substantially increase floral abscission rates from year to year.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011877029

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1890/04-1454



Related references

Florivore impacts on plant reproductive success and pollinator mortality in an obligate pollination mutualism. Oecologia 173(4): 1345-1354, 2014

Non-random fruit retention in Yucca filamentosa: consequences for an obligate mutualism. Oikos. April; 783: 576-584, 1997

Pollinator divergence within an obligate mutualism: Two yucca moth species (Lepidoptera; Prodoxidae: Tegeticula) on the Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia; Agavaceae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96(6): 716-722, 2003

Pollinator divergence within an obligate mutualism Two yucca moth species on the Joshua tree. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96(6): 716-722, November, 2003

Pollinator attraction to volatiles from virgin and pollinated host flowers in a yucca/moth obligate mutualism. Oikos 120(10): 1577-1583, 2011

Evolutionary origins of the yucca yucca moth mutualism an ancestral pollinator straddles the antagonism mutualism interface. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 72(2 SUPPL): 217, 1991

Specialization in the yucca-yucca moth obligate pollination mutualism: A role for antagonism?. American Journal of Botany 103(10): 1803-1809, 2016

Impact of the third trophic level in an obligate mutualism: do yucca plants benefit from parasitoids of yucca moths?. International Journal of Plant Sciences 167(1): 119-124, 2006

Effect of pollinator-inflicted ovule damage on floral abscission in the yucca-yucca moth mutualism: the role of mechanical and chemical factors. Oecologia 136(2): 236-243, 2003

A plant pollinator obligate mutualism stabilized by a rust fungus?. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 73(2 SUPPL): 296-297, 1992

Yucca aloifolia (Asparagaceae) opts out of an obligate pollination mutualism. American Journal of Botany 101(12): 2062-2067, 2015

Cheating in an obligate mutualism: How often do yucca moths benefit yuccas?. Oikos 72(3): 382-394, 1995

Yuccas and yucca moths Re-examining the cost of an obligate mutualism. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 74(2 SUPPL ): 144, 1993

How to become a yucca moth: Minimal trait evolution needed to establish the obligate pollination mutualism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 100(4): 847-855, 2010