+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography



Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography



Journal of the American College of Cardiology 47(9): 1840-1845



The aim of this study was to quantify and compare effective doses from conventional angiography and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography using a 16-slice scanner. Multislice computed tomography is now a viable modality for cardiac imaging. However, for any diagnostic use of ionizing radiation, the risk to the patient must be considered and justified. Multislice computed tomography angiography and conventional angiography were used to assess 180 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Estimates of effective dose were derived from exposure data recorded for each patient examination. For each modality, a comparable calculation technique was used, based on Monte Carlo modeling of the standard Cristy phantom. In a subset of 91 directly comparable patients the mean effective dose for MSCT coronary angiography was 14.7 mSv (SD 2.2) and that for conventional angiography was 5.6 mSv (SD 3.6). A significant difference in effective dose was seen between the two protocols. The mean effective dose for MSCT coronary angiography was significantly higher than that for conventional angiography. As MSCT cardiac scanners become increasingly available, operators must be aware of the radiation dose and the factors that affect it.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011885321

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16682310

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.078


Related references

A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 96(12): 922-926, 2010

Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography A comparison with conventional angiography in 62 patients. Circulation 104(17 Suppl.): II 614, 2001

Radiation dose exposure in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. International Journal of Cardiology 124(3): 307-311, 2008

Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 34(5): 652-659, 2010

Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. American Journal of Cardiology 93(5): 537-542, 2004

Right coronary artery arising from pulmonary trunk: assessment with conventional coronary angiography and multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 10(2): 178-182, 2009

64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal 28(24): 3042-3050, 2007

Sixteen-row multislice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography and intraoperative findings. Journal of Neurosurgery 108(6): 1184-1191, 2008

Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 48(9): 1896-1910, 2006

Multislice computed tomography angiography of the abdominal arteries: comparison between computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography findings in 52 cases. Australasian Radiology 48(2): 142-147, 2004

A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 5(3): 969-971, 2013

Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography. Acta Radiologica 48(9): 967-973, 2007

Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 62(16): 1476-1485, 2013

Effective radiation dose of three diagnostic tests in cardiology: single photon emission computed tomography, invasive coronary angiography and cardiac computed tomography angiography. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 32(12): 981-986, 2013

Diagnostic value of the 16-detector row multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis in comparison to invasive coronary angiography. Clinical Cardiology 30(3): 118-123, 2007