+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Development of a methacholine challenge method to minimize methacholine waste

Development of a methacholine challenge method to minimize methacholine waste

Chest 124(4): 1522-1525

Background: The standard 2-min tidal breathing methacholine challenge utilizes 3 mL to produce an output of 0.26 mL per 2 min, resulting in a substantial amount of methacholine being discarded. Objective: To develop a method with reduced methacholine waste and to compare it to the standard method. Methods: Twelve subjects with mild, well-controlled asthma volunteered for this investigation. They underwent three methacholine challenges in random order. The first challenge was the conventional 2-min tidal breathing method using 3 mL of doubling concentrations inhaled for 2 min at 5-min intervals. The first modification utilized 1.5 mL of quadrupling concentrations inhaled for 1 min and then 2 min, keeping the time interval constant at 3 min between completion of one inhalation and commencement of the next inhalation. The second modification utilized 1.5 mL of eightfold concentration step-ups inhaled for 30 s, 60 s, and 120 s with a time interval of 3 min between completion of one inhalation and commencement of the next inhalation. For each method, the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was calculated based on a 2-min equivalent-dose inhalation. Results: There was no significant difference in the geometric mean PC20 (1.5 mg/mL, 1.6 mg/mL, and 1.6 mg/mL for the three methods, respectively; p=0.47). The quadrupling concentration method was preferred because it was less subject to error than the other modification. Conclusion: The amount of methacholine discarded during a methacholine challenge can be reduced by two thirds by decreasing the volume from 3 to 1.5 mL, and by using quadrupling concentrations inhaled either with quadrupling-dose step-ups, or with doubling-dose step-ups by using sequential 1-min and 2-min inhalations.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 011944519

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 14555588

DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1522

Related references

Methacholine challenge in preschool children: methacholine-induced wheeze versus transcutaneous oximetry. European Respiratory Journal 14(5): 1175-1178, 1999

Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 12(3): 357-363, 2015

The use of methacholine inhalation, methacholine skin testing, distilled water inhalation challenge and eosinophil counts in the evaluation of patients presenting with cough and/or nonwheezing dyspnea. Annals of Allergy 56(4): 308-312, 1986

The correct methacholine challenge delivery method?. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 119(4): 1026-7; Author Reply 1027-9, 2007

Standardization of methacholine inhalation challenge by a reservoir method. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology 12(2): 131-136, 1994

An alternative method for describing methacholine challenge response curves. American Review of Respiratory Disease 145(4 PART 2): A706, 1992

The effect of challenge method on methacholine-induced changes in sensitivity and air trapping. Respiratory Medicine 105(1): 37-43, 2011

Methacholine bronchial challenge in clinical practice evaluation of a dosimeter method. American Review of Respiratory Disease 143(4 PART 2): A425, 1991

A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects. European Respiratory Journal 4(4): 497-502, 1991

Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 97(2): 175-181, 2006

Is there refractoriness to methacholine provoked bronchoconstriction 24 hours after a measurement of pd20 methacholine?. American Review of Respiratory Disease 143(4 PART 2): A410, 1991

Preparation and handling of methacholine chloride testing solutions. Effect of the hygroscopic properties of methacholine. American Review of Respiratory Disease 127(3): 350-351, 1983

Airway responsiveness in infants comparison of inhaled nebulized methacholine to nasal instillation of methacholine. American Review of Respiratory Disease 143(4 PART 2): A23, 1991

Development of pharmacodynamic methodology for determination of albuterol MDI bioequivalence Methacholine challenge study. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 93(1 PART 2): 249, 1994

Predictive value of sGaw, FEF(25-75), and FEV1 for development of asthma after a negative methacholine challenge test. Journal of Asthma 46(3): 284-290, 2009