+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Does a preceding hand wash and drying time after surgical hand disinfection influence the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub?



Does a preceding hand wash and drying time after surgical hand disinfection influence the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub?



Bmc Microbiology 6: 57



Recently, a propanol-based hand rub has been described to exceed the efficacy requirements of the European standard EN 12791 in only 1.5 min significantly. But the effect of a 1 min preceding hand wash and the effect of one additional minute for evaporation of the alcohol after its application on the efficacy after a 1.5 min application time has never been studied. We have investigated a propanol-based hand rub (Sterillium, based on 45% propan-2-ol, 30% propan-1-ol and 0.2% mecetronium etilsulfate) in three variations: with (A) and without (B) a 1 min hand wash before the disinfection of 1.5 min with immediate sampling after the disinfection; and (C) without a hand wash before the disinfection but with sampling 1 min after the disinfection. The efficacy of the three variations was compared to the reference treatment of EN 12791. All experiments were performed in a Latin-square design with 20 volunteers. Pre- and post-values (immediate and after 3 hr) were obtained according to EN 12791. The 3 min reference disinfection reduced resident hand bacteria on average by 1.8 log10 steps (immediate effect) and 1.4 log10-steps (sustained effect) respectively. Method A was equally effective as the reference (immediate efficacy: 1.5 log10-steps; sustained efficacy: 1.6 log10-steps). Method B seemed to be more effective (immediate efficacy: 2.3 log10-steps; sustained efficacy: 1.7 log10-steps). Method C revealed the best efficacy (immediate efficacy: 2.3 log10-steps; sustained efficacy: 2.0 log10-steps). A comparison of all three treatment variations and the reference treatment revealed a significant difference for the immediate efficacy (p = 0.026; Friedman test), but not for the sustained efficacy (p = 0.430). A post-hoc-test for the immediate efficacy indicated a significant difference between methods A and C (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon-Wilcox test). Hence, none of the treatment variations was significantly less effective than the reference treatment. An application of the propanol-based hand rub for 1.5 min after 1 min hand wash fulfills the efficacy requirements of EN 12791. The efficacy can be improved to some extent by omitting the preceding hand wash and by awaiting the evaporation of the alcohol which is clinical practice anyway. The preceding hand wash has the most negative effect on the immediate effect. Based on our data hands should not be routinely washed before the disinfection period unless there is a good reason for it such as visible soiling.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011973455

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16790073

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-57


Related references

A 1-minute hand wash does not impair the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub in two consecutive surgical hand disinfection procedures. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 28(11): 1357-1362, 2010

Lack of antimicrobial efficacy of mecetronium etilsulfate in propanol-based hand rubs for surgical hand disinfection. Journal of Hospital Infection 96(2): 189-191, 2017

Surgical hand disinfection with a propanol-based hand rub: equivalence of shorter application times. Journal of Hospital Infection 59(4): 304-310, 2005

Effect of a 1 min hand wash on the bactericidal efficacy of consecutive surgical hand disinfection with standard alcohols and on skin hydration. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 209(3): 285-291, 2006

Efficacy of alcohol-based gels compared with simple hand wash and hygienic hand disinfection. Journal of Hospital Infection 56 Suppl 2: S13-S15, 2004

Population kinetics of the skin flora on gloved hands following surgical hand disinfection with 3 propanol-based hand rubs: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28(3): 346-350, 2007

Efficacy of Germicidal Hand Wash Agents in Hygienic Hand Disinfection 1. Journal of Food Protection 45(8): 713-720, 2019

Efficacy of two distinct ethanol-based hand rubs for surgical hand disinfection -- a controlled trial according to prEN 12791. Bmc Infectious Diseases 5: 17, 2005

An in-use microbiological comparison of two surgical hand disinfection techniques in cardiothoracic surgery: hand rubbing versus hand scrubbing. Journal of Hospital Infection 67(1): 62-66, 2007

Long-term effect of a 1.5 minute surgical hand rub with a propanol-based product on the resident hand flora. Journal of Hospital Infection 66(1): 84-85, 2007

Less and less-influence of volume on hand coverage and bactericidal efficacy in hand disinfection. Bmc Infectious Diseases 13: 472, 2014

World Health Organization-recommended hand-rub formulations do not meet European efficacy requirements for surgical hand disinfection in five minutes. Journal of Hospital Infection 78(2): 123-127, 2011

Influence of rub-in technique on required application time and hand coverage in hygienic hand disinfection. Bmc Infectious Diseases 8: 149, 2009

Disinfection efficacy of hand hygiene based on chlorhexidine gluconate content and usage of alcohol-based hand-rubbing solution. Yakugaku Zasshi 134(11): 1219-1225, 2015

Surgical hand antisepsis-a pilot study comparing povidone iodine hand scrub and alcohol-based chlorhexidine gluconate hand rub. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 41(1): 12-16, 2012