+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Genetic diversity, population structure, effective population size and demographic history of the Finnish wolf population

Genetic diversity, population structure, effective population size and demographic history of the Finnish wolf population

Molecular Ecology 15(6): 1561-1576

The Finnish wolf population (Canis lupus) was sampled during three different periods (1996-1998, 1999-2001 and 2002-2004), and 118 individuals were genotyped with 10 microsatellite markers. Large genetic variation was found in the population despite a recent demographic bottleneck. No spatial population subdivision was found even though a significant negative relationship between genetic relatedness and geographic distance suggested isolation by distance. Very few individuals did not belong to the local wolf population as determined by assignment analyses, suggesting a low level of immigration in the population. We used the temporal approach and several statistical methods to estimate the variance effective size of the population. All methods gave similar estimates of effective population size, approximately 40 wolves. These estimates were slightly larger than the estimated census size of breeding individuals. A Bayesian model based on Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations indicated strong evidence for a long-term population decline. These results suggest that the contemporary wolf population size is roughly 8% of its historical size, and that the population decline dates back to late 19th century or early 20th century. Despite an increase of over 50% in the census size of the population during the whole study period, there was only weak evidence that the effective population size during the last period was higher than during the first. This may be caused by increased inbreeding, diminished dispersal within the population, and decreased immigration to the population during the last study period.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012119121

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16629811

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02877.x

Related references

Population Structure, Genetic Diversity, Effective Population Size, Demographic History and Regional Connectivity Patterns of the Endangered Dusky Grouper, Epinephelus marginatus (Teleostei: Serranidae), within Malta's Fisheries Management Zone. Plos One 11(7): E0159864-E0159864, 2016

A comparison of single-sample effective size estimators using empirical toad (Bufo calamita) population data: genetic compensation and population size-genetic diversity correlations. Molecular Ecology 18(23): 4790-4797, 2010

Effect of harvest and effective population size on genetic diversity in a striped bass population. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society ember; 129(6): 1367-1372, 2000

Founder representation and effective population size in old versus young breeds-genetic diversity of Finnish and Nordic Spitz. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 134(5): 422-433, 2017

Demographic inference using genetic data from a single individual: Separating population size variation from population structure. Theoretical Population Biology 104: 46-58, 2016

Reduced genetic diversity and effective population size in an endangered Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) population from Maine, USA. Conservation Genetics 7(1): 91-104, 2006

Past and Present Processes Influencing Genetic Diversity and Effective Population Size in a Natural Population of Atlantic Sturgeon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141(1): 56-67, 2012

The wolf. History, systematics, morphology, ecology. Reproduction and population structure. Results of wolf population disturbances. Unknown, 1985

Estimating demographic contributions to effective population size in an age-structured wild population experiencing environmental and demographic stochasticity. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(5): 1082-1093, 2017

Genetic diversity, population genetic structure and demographic history of Przewalski’s gazelle Procapra przewalskii implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics 12(6): 1457-1468, 2011

Population genetic structure and effective population size of ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis), an amphidromous fish. Journal of Fish Biology 70(Suppl. B): 191-201, 2007

Living on the edge: reconstructing the genetic history of the Finnish wolf population. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 14(): 64-64, 2014

Interspecific hybridization contributes to high genetic diversity and apparent effective population size in an endemic population of mottled ducks (Anas fulvigula maculosa). Conservation Genetics 15(3): 509-520, 2014

Effective population size and genetic structure of a Piute ground squirrel (Spermophilus mollis) population. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79(1): 34, 2001

The confounding effects of population structure, genetic diversity and the sampling scheme on the detection and quantification of population size changes. Genetics 186(3): 983-995, 2011