+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Influence of the structure of new generation prostheses on shrinkage after implant in the abdominal wall



Influence of the structure of new generation prostheses on shrinkage after implant in the abdominal wall



Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B Applied Biomaterials 78(2): 340-346



When a biomaterial is used to repair an abdominal wall defect, wound contraction can cause the prosthesis to shrink, and the tension generated can provoke recurrence of the defect. This study was designed to determine whether the structure of a prosthesis can directly influence prosthetic shrinkage. Abdominal wall defects (7 x 5 cm) in rabbits were repaired using the laminar prosthesis DualMesh (DM), the composites Sepramesh (Se) and Vypro II (Vy), and the reticular prosthesis Surgipro (PP). The animals were sacrificed 14 and 90 days after surgery, at which time implant specimens were morphologically and immunohistochemically examined to establish the presence of myofibroblasts and macrophages. The size of each prosthesis was measured at the end of the study through image analysis. Morphometric measurements revealed greatest prosthesis shrinkage for Se, PP, and Vy (16.05% +/- 5.08%; 13.75% +/- 4.22%; 16.16% +/- 6.34%), while the DM prostheses only showed a 7.57% +/- 0.62% decrease in size (p < 0.05). In the DM implants, the macrophage response and myofibroblast labeling were reduced. Both biomaterial structure and the macrophage reaction induced at the implant site modulate prosthetic shrinkage, laminar prostheses of the ePTFE type undergoing less shrinkage than reticular meshes. Reduced DM shrinkage was linked to decreased myofibroblast numbers 2 weeks postimplant.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012212061

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16544301

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30493


Related references

Modifications in the abdominal wall after prostheses implant in guinea pigs. Experimental preliminary study. Chirurgia 101(1): 41-46, 2006

Composite prostheses for the repair of abdominal wall defects: effect of the structure of the adhesion barrier component. Hernia 9(4): 338-343, 2005

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall by using a combination of the human acellular dermal matrix implant and an interpositional omentum flap after extensive tumor resection in patients with abdominal wall neoplasm: a preliminary result. World Journal of Gastroenterology 14(5): 752-757, 2008

Variation of specific gravity and tangential shrinkage in the wall thickness of Bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus) and its possible influence on the trend of the shrinkage-moisture content characteristic. Indian Forest Bulletin (259): 7 + 6 fig., 1970

Influence of the connector and implant design on the implant-tooth-connected prostheses. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 12(3): 254-262, 2010

On the cause of the anisotropic shrinkage of wood. XIX. On the relationships between the structure of the cell-wall and the anisotropic shrinkage in transverse section.. Sci. Rep. Kyoto Prefect. Univ. (Agric.), 12, 98-105, 1960

Inflammatory reaction and tensile strength of the abdominal wall after an implant of polypropylene mesh and polypropylene/poliglecaprone mesh for abdominal wall defect treatment in rats. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 29(Suppl. 1): 45-51, 2014

Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments. Clinical Oral Investigations 15(1): 89-97, 2011

Abdominal wall prostheses. Biomechanic and histological study. Chirurgie; Memoires de l'Academie de Chirurgie 121(4): 253-265, 1996

Prostheses and sutures for repairing abdominal wall defects. Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association 1: 239-242, 1960

Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life. Clinical Oral Implants Research 27(2): E31-E37, 2016

Proposal for a new classification of prostheses used in the repair of abdominal wall hernial defects. Cirugia Espanola 78(3): 148-151, 2005

Long term behavior of biological prostheses used as abdominal wall substitutes. Histology and Histopathology 29(1): 139-149, 2014

Biological prostheses: indications and usefulness in the repair of abdominal wall defect. Cirugia Espanola 83(6): 283-289, 2008

Double-layer prostheses for repair of abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model. Journal of Surgical Research 55(1): 32-37, 1993