+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes



Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes



Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 21(2): 472-477



Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor (RALD) nephrectomy, a new procedure for the removal of a kidney from a living donor, was performed on 13 subjects at our centre. The immediate post-operative courses for these donors, and their respective recipients, were compared with those of 13 previous open live-donor nephrectomies (OPEN), performed in our facility. We found no significant differences between these two donor groups with respect to age, gender, body mass index or renal vasculature. The average operative times and the warm ischaemia times were greater in the RALD group, 185.5'' vs 113.4'' (P = 0.0001) and 7'15'' vs 1'41'' (P = 0.0001), respectively. There was no conversion to the open procedure in the RALD group. The estimated blood loss was slight in both groups. Following nephrectomy, deep venous thrombosis occurred in one RALD patient and acute pyelonephritis in one OPEN patient. The average duration of hospitalization was shorter after the RALD procedure (5.84+/-1.8 days vs 9.69+/-2.2 days, P = 0.0001). The estimated creatinine clearance rate (eClcreat) was equivalent for all donors, at 5 days and 1 month after nephrectomy. All kidneys started functioning immediately after the transplantation. The mean recipient eClcreat (ml/min) was 58.16+/-26.7 for OPEN group kidneys and 62.23+/-17.59 for RALD group kidneys (P = 0.65), 5 days after transplantation. RALD nephrectomies were associated with very low morbidity among donors, in which both the operative and warm ischaemia times were of longer duration, but had no observable adverse effects upon short-term graft function.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012522643

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16204289

DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfi150


Related references

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy A comparison of donor tolerance and renal allograft outcomes stratified by donor age. Journal of Urology 171(4 Suppl.): 485, 2004

Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: a cost-minimization analysis. Journal of Surgical Research 176(2): E89-E94, 2012

Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy has Equivalent Early and Late Renal Function Outcomes Compared With Open Donor Nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 175(1): 236-237, 2006

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65(5): 862-866, 2005

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared to open donor nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 169(4 Suppl.): 469, 2003

Hand-assisted retroperitoheoscopic live donor nephrectomy in comparison to open and laparoscopic procedures: A prospective study on donor morbidity and kidney function. Transplantation 78(1): 147-153, 2004

Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy in Comparison to Open and Laparoscopic Procedures: A Prospective Study on Donor Morbidity and Kidney Function. Transplantation 78(1): 147-153, 2004

Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy in Comparison to Open and Laparoscopic Procedures: A Prospective Study on Donor Morbidity and Kidney Function. Journal of Urology 173(2): 480-481, 2005

Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of outcomes. Journal of Urology 166(4): 1270-1274, 2001

Comparison of 100 consecutive hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies to open live donor nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 167(4 Suppl.): 370, 2002

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparable donor/recipient outcomes, costs, and decreased convalescence as compared to open donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 33(1-2): 1106-1107, 2001

Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy. Urologia Internationalis 84(1): 61-66, 2010

A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 67(5): 722-728, 1999

Early and late recipient graft function and donor outcome after laparoscopic vs open adult live donor nephrectomy for pediatric renal transplantation. Archives of Surgery 137(8): 908, 2002

Comparison of donor, and early and late recipient outcomes following hand assisted and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 189(2): 618-622, 2013