+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluating capacity development for participatory forest management in Bangladesh's Sal forests based on '4Rs' stakeholder analysis



Evaluating capacity development for participatory forest management in Bangladesh's Sal forests based on '4Rs' stakeholder analysis



Forest Policy and Economics 8(8): 785-796



Participatory forest management (PFM) in Bangladesh has become the dominant strategy in the country's forestry sector. The main goal of PFM is to enhance the capacity of both state and civil society stakeholders to manage forests in a sustainable manner. This study aims to evaluate capacity development for key stakeholders using '4Rs' stakeholder analysis. The data for this study were collected through focus group discussions with local stakeholders, individual interviews with forest department (FD) staff and a sample survey of participating farmers. Information derived from focus group and individual interviews were analysed using conceptual content analysis and sample survey data were analysed using statistical analysis. Conceptual content analysis suggested the following: among stakeholders, the national government, concerned civil servants, concerned FD staff and the funding agency are the most important and influential stakeholders; although local FD staff and participating farmers are important and are the most experienced stakeholders, they cannot participate in the decision-making process and thus are less influential as stakeholders. The FD usually has ownership and revenue collection rights over a PFM project, while participating farmers have only usufruct rights over the forest resources and are responsible for protecting and managing the participatory managed forests, so that those stakeholders with many responsibilities and rights benefit less. Relationships between the project implementers and the local stakeholders are poor. Statistical analysis suggests that in respect to participating farmers: about 46% did not received any benefits from the forests; about 30% who received benefits were not satisfied with what they received; about 85% did not attend any decision-making process; about 19% did not agree with the strategy of PFM; and about 28% were unable to participate in PFM with their acquired capacity. Overall analyses suggest that the capacity of stakeholders for sustainable PFM did not develop to the level anticipated under the project proposal.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012786861

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.12.004


Related references

'Economic stakeholder analysis' for participatory forest management. ODI Forestry Briefing (4): 4 pp., 2003

Stakeholder incentives in participatory forest management: a manual for economic analysis. Stakeholder incentives in participatory forest management: a manual for economic analysis: xvii + 238 pp., 2003

Stakeholder analysis through participatory rural appraisal for land use and joint forest management in raised coastal areas. Stakeholder analysis through participatory rural appraisal for land use and joint forest management in raised coastal areas: ix + 58 pp., 2003

Management of forests for local use in the hills of Nepal. 2. Towards the development of participatory forest management. Journal of world forest resource management(1): 1-13, 1990

Development of participatory forest management for community forests in the Koshi Hills. Banko Janakari 4(1): 47-52, 1993

Stakeholder incentives in participatory forest management. 2003

Nature-based tourism in private forests: Stakeholder management balancing the interests of entrepreneurs and forest owners?. Journal of Rural Studies 35: 70-79, 2014

The use of economics to assess stakeholder incentives in participatory forest management: a review. European Union Tropical Forestry Paper ( 5): ix + 45 pp., 1999

Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Natural Resources Forum 19(2): 113-124, 1995

'Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management'. Papers presented at a IUFRO/CIFOR/FAO conference 'Sustainable forest management: fostering stakeholder input to advance development of scientifically based indicators' held in Melbourne, Australia, August 1998. ' Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management' Papers presented at a IUFRO/CIFOR/FAO conference ' Sustainable forest management: fostering stakeholder input to advance development of scientifically based indicators' held in Melbourne, Australia, August 1998: xiv + 462 pp., 2001

Evaluating multi-stakeholder perceptions of project impacts: a participatory value-based multi-criteria approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 16(3): 177-190, 2009

Searching for a new paradigm in sustainable forest management: participatory forest management as a strategy for forest conservation and development in the tropics. News of Forest History (30): 49-57, 2001

Participatory forestry: participatory development practised in forest management. World Forestry Research 12(5): 20-25, 1999

Effects of participatory forest management on livelihood capitals of the community in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Research 19(1): 42-51, 2014

Evaluating local multi-stakeholder platforms in forest management in Ontario. The Forestry Chronicle 86(6): 742-752, 2010