+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluating genetic containment strategies for transgenic plants



Evaluating genetic containment strategies for transgenic plants



Trends in Biotechnology 24(3): 109-114



One of the primary concerns about genetically engineered crop plants is that they will hybridize with wild relatives, permitting the transgene to escape into the environment. The likelihood that a transgene will spread in the environment depends on its potential fitness impact. The fitness conferred by various transgenes to crop and/or wild-type hybrids has been evaluated in several species. Different strategies have been developed for reducing the probability and impact of gene flow, including physical separation from wild relatives and genetic engineering. Mathematical models and empirical experimental evidence suggest that genetic approaches have the potential to effectively prevent transgenes from incorporating into wild relatives and becoming established in wild populations that are not reproductively isolated from genetically engineered crops.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012786872

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16460821

DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.006


Related references

A built-in strategy for containment of transgenic plants: creation of selectively terminable transgenic rice. Plos One 3(3): E1818-E1818, 2008

Strategies for evaluating cost containment approaches. Business and Health Spec No: 4-30, 1989

Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnology 20(6): 581-586, June, 2002

Strategies of genetic engineering for the obtainment of transgenic plants resistant to geminiviruses. Experience at CENSA. 2007

Progress in the evaluation of transgenic fish for possible ecological risk and its containment strategies. Science in China. Series C, Life Sciences 50(5): 573-579, 2007

Transgenic plants: performance, release and containment. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 10(2): 139-144, 1994

Evaluating biological containment strategies for pollen-mediated gene flow. Environmental Biosafety Research 9(2): 67-73, 2011

Chloroplast-transgenic plants: panacea - no! gene containment - yes!. Nature Biotechnology 16(7): 602, 1998

The release of transgenic plants from containment, and the move towards their widespread use in agriculture. Euphytica 85(1-3): 425-431, 1995

A practical guide to containment: greenhouse research with transgenic plants and microbes. A practical guide to containment: greenhouse research with transgenic plants and microbes: viii + 59 pp., 2001

Designing weed containment strategies: An approach based on feasibilities of eradication and containment. Diversity and Distributions 20(5): 555-566, 2014

Genetic diversity among plants of non-transgenic and transgenic versions of a single cross maize hybrid. Field Crops Research 176: 56-60, 2015

Approaches to evaluating the transgenic status of transformed plants. Trends in Biotechnology 15(4): 141-146, 1997

Genetic transformation of plants, recombination processes, and gene expression regulation in transgenic plants. Molekuliarnaia Genetika, Mikrobiologiia i Virusologiia: 3-12, 1999

Are your plants normal? - genetic instability in regenerated and transgenic plants. Agro Food Industry Hi Tech 4(3): 7-12, 1993