+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A cross-sectional study of the characteristics and determinants of emergency care utilization among people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan



A cross-sectional study of the characteristics and determinants of emergency care utilization among people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan



Research in Developmental Disabilities 27(6): 657-667



The purpose of this study was to identify health characteristics of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) and to assess the use of emergency care facilities by these people and factors affecting this utilization. A cross-sectional study was employed. Subjects were recruited from the Taiwan National Disability Registration System. A total of 1071 people registered with ID in Taiwan were recruited for this study in 2001. Data were collected via a structured mail-out questionnaire that was completed by the main carers of people with ID. Most of the carers subjectively characterized the overall health status of people with ID as good-excellent. However, people with ID carry a burden of diseases greater than that of the general population. Nearly half (47.7%) of the subjects reported having an illness in the past 7 months. Most of the morbidity was associated with neurological, psychiatric, digestive, dermatological and cardiovascular diseases or disorders. One-third of subjects took medication regularly and 15% were 'Major Illness' card beneficiaries of the Taiwan National Health Insurance scheme. About two-thirds of individuals with ID were classified as having multiple disabilities and 24.5% needed to be provided with frequent rehabilitative therapies to maintain their normal daily functions. Respondents indicated that 18.4% of the subjects had used emergency care in the past 7 months. A stepwise logistic regression model highlighted that the following need factors were significantly related to the utilization of emergency care: having an illness (OR=2.1, 95% CI=1.2-3.6), taking medicine regularly (OR=1.8, 95% CI=1.1-2.9) and self-reported health status (poor health: OR=9.9, 95% CI=2.1-45.7; bad health: OR=8.2, 95% CI=1.3-49.8). To ensure that people with ID minimize their utilization of emergency care, it is necessary to establish in appropriate community systems to monitor individuals with ID with poor health status, diseases and who take medicine regularly.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012937388

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16278062

DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.09.001


Related references

Medical care services for people with intellectual disabilities living in the general community: a cross-sectional survey of inpatient care utilization in Taiwan, 2001. Disability and Rehabilitation 29(18): 1411-1416, 2007

Staff experiences of appreciative management in the institutional care of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities - a cross-sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 31(4): 930-938, 2017

Utilization of inpatient care and its determinants among persons with intellectual disabilities in day care centres in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 48(Pt 7): 655-662, 2004

Equity in social care for people with intellectual disabilities? A cross-sectional study examining the distribution of social care funding across local authorities in England. Health and Social Care in the Community 25(3): 901-911, 2017

Prevalence of reported physical health problems in people with severe or profound intellectual and motor disabilities: a cross-sectional study of medical records and care plans. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 60(11): 1109-1118, 2016

Body weight and mental disorders : Results from a clinical psychiatric cross-sectional study of people with intellectual disabilities. Der Nervenarzt 89(5): 552-558, 2018

Self-reported stigma and symptoms of anxiety and depression in people with intellectual disabilities: Findings from a cross sectional study in England. Journal of Affective Disorders 187: 224-231, 2015

Physical activity and play behaviours in children and young people with intellectual disabilities: A cross-sectional observational study. School Psychology International 36(2): 154-171, 2015

Association of anticholinergic burden with adverse effects in older people with intellectual disabilities: an observational cross-sectional study. British Journal of Psychiatry 209(6): 504-510, 2016

Does risk and urgency of requested out-of-hours general practitioners care differ for people with intellectual disabilities in residential settings compared with the general population in the Netherlands? A cross-sectional routine data-based study. BMJ Open 7(11): E019222, 2018

Self-reported stigma and its association with socio-demographic factors and physical disability in people with intellectual disabilities: results from a cross-sectional study in England. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 51(3): 465-474, 2016

Papanicolaou smear screening of women with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Taiwan. Research in Developmental Disabilities 31(2): 403-409, 2010

Unmet Needs of Adults in Community Mental Health Care With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Study. Community Mental Health Journal 53(1): 15-26, 2017

Needs among persons with human immunodeficiency virus and intellectual and developmental disabilities in community mental health care: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 61(3): 292-299, 2017

Job strain and determinants in staff working in institutions for people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan: a test of the Job Demand-Control-Support model. Research in Developmental Disabilities 30(1): 146-157, 2009