+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation



Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation



Otology & Neurotology 28(1): 129-134



Hypothesis: High-resolution imaging, as provided by flat-panel-based volume computed tomography (fpVCT), could increase navigation accuracy and could therefore improve image-guided procedures or make novel navigated surgery concepts possible.Background: Intraoperative navigation is an accepted toot in head and neck surgery. However, its use is limited in the lateral cranial base because of its low surgical accuracy. Surgical accuracy is substantially influenced by the resolution of the underlying data set. The fpVCT offers a resolution of nearly two times higher than multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Target registration error (TRE), as a measurement for surgical navigation accuracy, should decrease when navigation is based on fpVCT data sets.Methods: An acrylic glass phantom with 37 fiducial points was scanned in a current MSCT and in an experimental fpVCT. Both data sets were imported in an optical navigation system. Five fiducial points were used for registration, and seven points were used for measuring TRE. The distance between the indicated pointer tip and the corresponding fiducial point in data set was measured as TRE. Registration and TRE measurement were repeated five times for each computed tomographic data set. Average TREs were calculated, and results were compared using t-test.Results: The average TRE using MSCT (0.82 mm [standard deviation, 0.35 mm]) was significantly higher than that using fpVCT (0.46 turn [standard deviation, 0.22 mm]) (p < 0.01).Conclusion: Submillimeter surgical navigation accuracy is possible using high-resolution fpVCT. This could be highly beneficial in cranial base surgery navigation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 012983301

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17195752

DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000244364.16826.09


Related references

A true minimally invasive approach for cochlear implantation: high accuracy in cranial base navigation through flat-panel-based volume computed tomography. Otology and Neurotology 29(2): 120-123, 2008

Comparison of the clinical accuracy of cervical (C2-C7) pedicle screw insertion assisted by fluoroscopy, computed tomography-based navigation, and intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm navigation. Chinese Medical Journal 123(21): 2995-2998, 2010

Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model: flat-panel volume computed tomography compared with multislice computed tomography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 108(3): 443-449, 2009

Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography. Investigative Radiology 42(5): 291-296, 2007

Three-dimensional analysis of computed tomography-based navigation system for total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation system. Journal of Arthroplasty 24(7): 1103-1110, 2009

Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation for placement of percutaneous pedicle screws. Global Spine Journal 3(2): 103-108, 2014

Flat-panel computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography to evaluate cochlear implant positioning. Cochlear Implants International 12(4): 216-222, 2011

In vitro high-resolution flat-panel computed tomographic arthrography for artificial cartilage defect detection: comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Investigative Radiology 48(8): 614-621, 2013

"Mirroring" computational planning, navigation guidance system, and intraoperative mobile C-arm cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detector: a new rationale in primary and secondary treatment of midfacial fractures?. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 69(6): 1697-1707, 2011

Accuracy of pedicle screw placement based on preoperative computed tomography versus intraoperative data set acquisition for spinal navigation system. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 25(2): 2309499017718901, 2018

Standard navigation versus intraoperative computed tomography navigation in upper cervical spine trauma. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 14(1): 169-182, 2019

Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation with automated referencing, part I: cervicothoracic spine. Neurosurgery 69(4): 782-95; Discussion 795, 2011

Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation with automated referencing. Part II: thoracolumbar spine. Neurosurgery 69(6): 1307-1316, 2011

Percutaneous bone biopsy using a flat-panel cone beam computed tomography virtual navigation system. Saudi Medical Journal 39(5): 519-523, 2018

High-resolution computed tomography with single-slice computed tomography and 16-channel multidetector computed tomography: a comparison regarding visibility and motion artifacts. Acta Radiologica 48(9): 956-961, 2007