+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How uncertain is our estimate of a wellhead protection zone?

How uncertain is our estimate of a wellhead protection zone?

Ground water 36(1): 49-57

Protection zones for wells are defined through the use of pathline tracing in ground water flow models. Traditional approaches to ground water flow modeling focus on obtaining a single best model, occasionally supplemented by the use of sensitivity analyses. In most situations this approach is inappropriate because the ground water flow model is so poorly determined that a variety of different boundary conditions and parameter values would give similar predictions of heads. However, the range of feasible models may well give radically different predictions of the variable for which the model has been built. For example, the area, orientation, or many other descriptive variables of a catchment may be much more sensitive to the parameters used in a ground water flow model than are the values of head commonly used to calibrate the model. This paper outlines a procedure to determine the range of predictions of catchments which would arise from alternative calibrations of a model. The range of catchments is used to identify zones of certainty and uncertainty, leading to alternative definitions of the protection zone for differing purposes. An example is presented, based on Bestwood Pumping Station, Nottinghamshire, which is located in the Triassic Sandstone Aquifer of the northern East Midlands of the United Kingdom. A trial and error calibration of a ground water flow model is used to determine an acceptable level for automatic calibration in the subsequent step. Only 12 measurements of ground water head were available, and these were used to determine the fit of a variety of model structures. A search routine revealed a range of feasible models and superposition of their catchments delineated the zones of certainty and uncertainty, which had areas of 7.4 and 15.2 km2, respectively.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 013137143

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01064.x

Related references

The role of geostatistics in wellhead protection zone delineation in glacial drift. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 37(7): 392, 2005

Tools for wellhead protection; wellhead delineation and contingency planning. Ground Water Management 1: 463-477, 1990

Gladeville Utility District wellhead protection project; use of fluorescent dyes to determine the groundwater zone of contribution to a public water supply source. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 59(3): 170, 1997

Protection of public ground water supplies in Colorado and New Mexico through wellhead protection. Abstracts and Program - Annual Conference, New Mexico Section, American Water Resource Association 6(1993, 1993

Overview of a wellhead protection program; from the determination of recharge areas to the development of aquifer protection regulations. Journal of the New England Water Works Association: 4, Pages 238-247. 1990., 1990

Groundwater protection using vulnerability maps and wellhead protection area WHPA; a case study in Mexico. Water Resources Management 24.15, 2010

The protection of mineral and spring water; reinforced wellhead protection?. Houille Blanche 50(2-3): 3, 77-80, 1995

The Environmental Protection Agency's role in wellhead protection. Annual Meeting - Association of Engineering Geologists 36: 42, 1993

Wellhead protection. 1987

GIS for wellhead protection. Annual Meeting - Association of Engineering Geologists 36: 67, 1993

A guide to wellhead protection. 1995

Wellhead protection programs. 1989

Utilization of a GIS for wellhead protection. Pages 229-234 1995, 1995

Groundwater and wellhead protection in the HUA. 1999

Incorporating public water-supply springs into the Utah Wellhead Protection Program; two examples of using hydrologic mapping to help delineate protection zones around springs. Annual Meeting - Association of Engineering Geologists 36: 60-61, 1993