+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Varietal trials with fodder-beet: mangels, fodder sugar-beet and sugar-beet for fodder 1950-1953. (Medd. 508. Slot. Forsegsvirk. Plantskult. Tidsskr. Plantsavl.)



Varietal trials with fodder-beet: mangels, fodder sugar-beet and sugar-beet for fodder 1950-1953. (Medd. 508. Slot. Forsegsvirk. Plantskult. Tidsskr. Plantsavl.)



Forsog med stammer af foderbeder: runkelroe, fodersukkerroe og sukkerroe,. STATENS FORSOGSVIRKSOMHED I PLANTS-KULTUR. 68(2): 357-9



The trials reported were carried out at 9 locations in Denmark. Two mangel, five fodder sugar-beet and two sugar-beet for fodder varieties were placed in the 1st Class category. The mangel varieties Barres 0tofte Nova XI and Hunsballe XI gave mean dry-matter yields of 116 h kg. per ha. from the roots and 35 per ha. from the tops, with dry-matter contents in the roots of 15-5 and 14-5%, respectively.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 013917045

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Trials on the different strains of fodder beets swede, fodder sugar beet and sugar beet in the years 1944-1947. Tidskr Planteavl 52(4): 699-702, 1949

Feeding trials with potatoes, fodder beet, and sugar beet leaf silage as a basic fodder for fattening pigs. Jahrb. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Futterungsberatung. 58. 1: 86-89, 1957

Carbohydrate compounds in meat of cattle fed on fodder of various composition sugar beet d fodder beet d. Dopovidi Akademiyi Nauk Ukrayins'koyi RSR 30(11): 1037-1039, 1968

Influence of fodder beet pollinators on the characteristics of sugar fodder beet hybrids. Euphytica 51(2): 119-126, 1990

Phenotypic polymorphism and allele differentiation of isozymes in fodder beet, multigerm sugar beet and monogerm sugar beet. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 77(5): 711-720, 1989

Comparison of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA from five morphologically distinct Beta vulgaris cultivars: sugar beet, fodder beet, beet root, foliage beet, and Swiss chard. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 79(4): 440-442, 1990

Root, fodder and other crop trials. Mangels, fodder beet and swedes. Rep. nat. Inst. agric. Bot. Camb., 1961. 41: 18, 1961

Phenmedipham residues after Betanal treatment in sugar beet, fodder beet, beet foliage and raw sugar. 1971

Fodder beet. Pt. II. A further comparison of Danish fodder-beet and English mangold in the South of England, 1950 and 1951. Emp. J. exp. Agric, 20: 80, 316-25. bibl. 13, 1952

Fodder-beet. 2. A further comparison of Danish fodder-beet and English mangold in the south of England, 1950 and 1951. Empire J. Exp. Agric 20: 316-325, 1952

Mechanised cultivation of fodder beet. 1. The importance of varietal choice and of effective weed control in fodder beet. Revue de l' Agriculture 34(3): 661-665, 1981

Comparison between sugar-beet and fodder sugar-beet 1950-56. Mead. 14 Gullak. Vaxtforadl-Anst, 15-24. bibl. 7, 1957

Trials with sugar beet, fodder beet and swedes. Varieties and lifting dates. Rapport, Institutionen for Vaxtodling, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (150): 24, 1985

Fodder Beet as a source of leaf spot infection (C. beticola) of Sugar Beet, and the removal of the danger by measures to prevent and eliminate the Sugar Beet infection. Pflanzenschutz. 12: 1, 1-2, 1960

Nutrient digestibility in sheep fed diets containing Roundup Ready or conventional fodder beet, sugar beet, and beet pulp1. Journal of Animal Science 83(2): 400-407, 2005