Retention of preservative salt by Spruce poles treated by the 'trough-suction' method.
Moldrup, N.
Traeindustrien 8(2): 29-31
1958
Accession: 014174286
Discusses results of a German study comparing them with Danish requirements for impregnated poles, which are for a retention of 6 kg. salt/cu.m. compared with the 3 kg. obtained in the experiment.
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Aho, V. 1969: The condition and salt retention of poles treated with water-borne preservatives after 15 years in service. I. Pine poles pressure-treated with Lahontuho K-33. II. Spruce poles treated by the Boucherie process with Tancas U Tied. Valt. Tekn. Tutkimusl. Sarja 1-PuuKnudsen, M. 1966: Preservative treatment of freshly cut Spruce poles with Cu-Cr-As salts by the open-tank-suction process Mitt. dt. Ges. Holzforsch. 53, 48-54
Gersonde, M.; Becker, G. 1965: Uptake, penetration depth and quantitative distribution of a Cf-F-As preservative salt mixture in Norway Spruce and Scots Pine poles after pressure impregnation Holz Roh- u. Werkstoff 23(9): 369-81
Walchli, O. 1964: Effect of different methods of treatment and preservative salts on salt distribution in treated transmission poles Holz Roh- u. Werkstoff 22(2): 64-8
Ruddick, J.N.R.; Jonsson, E.B.; Nilsson, E.M.A. 1991: Utility pole performance: effect of service life on surface hardness and preservative retention of CCA-treated pine poles Forest Products Journal 41(6): 21-27
Chin, C.W.; Natera, J.; McEvoy, C. 1988: 15-year service performance of copper-chromium-arsenic treated poles of Araucaria spp. in Papua New Guinea and some preservative retention data Holzforschung 42(2): 137-140
Rak, J. 1977: Treatment of spruce roundwood with a new CAA preservative. Part I. Preservative retention and penetration Forest Products Journal 27(8): 36-40
Rak, J. 1977: Treatment of spruce roundwood with a new CAA preservative. i. preservative retention and penetration Forest products journal 27(8): 36-40
Ruddick, J.N.R. 1978: Preservative treatment of white spruce poles Information Report, Western Forest Products Laboratory, Canada (VP-X-176): 26
Gersonde, M. 1968: Preservative treatment of Spruce transmission poles by sap-displacement methods Holz-Zbl 94(39): 599-601
Horn, J.; Dohle, H.; Gersonde, M. 1977: Distribution of Preservative salts in mechanically pretreated spruce poles after pressure impregnation Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 35(2): 67-73
Evans, P.D.; Cunningham, R.B.; Donnelly, C.F.; Hainey, S.D.; Bruce, A.; Smith, G.M.; King, B. 1991: The suitability of high pressure sap-displacement for the preservative treatment of U.K. grown spruce and pine poles Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 49(9): 363-368
Suolahti, O. 1956: Investigations of the preservative contents of salt-impregnated poles that have been in service for different periods. Tied. Valt. tekn. Tutkimusl. (Sarja I-Puu). 2, 16
Hartford, W.H.; Colley, R.H.; Soule, C.A.J. 1978: The mathematical relationship between assay standards and total preservative retention in southern pine poles Proceedings, American Wood Preservers' Association 74: 215-227
Burger, H. 1953: Warping in preservative-treated transmission poles. Mitt. schweiz. Anst. forstl. Versuchsw 29(2): 177-188
Giron, M.Y.; Garcia, C.M.; San Pablo, M.R. 1999: Remedial treatment of preservative-treated cocowood poles FPRDI Journal 25(1-2): 71-82
Kamdem, D.; Munson, J. 1997: Reconstituted particleboards from old CCA preservative treated utility poles Proceedings annual meeting of the American Wood Preservers' Association 2(92): 117-130
Hakansson, K. 1979: Glue jointing of preservative treated electricity poles International Journal of Wood Preservation 1(3): 115-118
Cooper, P.; Ung, T.; Aucoin, J.-P.; Timusk, C. 1996: The Potential for Re-Use of Preservative-Treated Utility Poles Removed From Service Waste Management and Research 14(3): 263-279
Cui, F.; Ruddick, J. N. R. 1994: A New Procedure for the Analysis of Chlorophenols in Preservative Treated Utility Poles International Journal of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry 57(1): 73-82