+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Selection of a remediation scenario for a diesel-contaminated site using LCA



Selection of a remediation scenario for a diesel-contaminated site using LCA



International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(4): 239-251



Goal and Scope. A comparison of in situ and ex situ treatment scenarios for a diesel-contaminated site was performed using an evolutive LCA. Treatment time along with primary (residual contamination left in soil or groundwater after treatment) and secondary (impacts due to remediation) environmental impacts were considered. The site under study had a Light Non Aqueous Phase Liquid (LNAPL) thickness of up to 1 m, a diesel soil concentration of 10,500 mg/kg and a residual contamination in groundwater.Methods. Four treatment scenarios to remove LNAPL and to treat soil and groundwater were compared: 1) pump and treat 2) bioslurping, bioventing and biosparging 3) bioslurping, bioventing and chemical oxidation and 4) ex situ treatment using biopiles. The technologies(1) design was performed using simulation tools and analytical equations. The LCA was evaluated for each year of treatment. Environmental impacts were assessed using the U.S. EPA Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) method.Results and Discussion. The biological in situ scenario (2) showed the least primary and secondary impacts but its treatment time was more than 4 times longer than that obtained for the ex situ scenario (4). The ex situ scenario showed the best treatment time but its secondary impacts were significantly higher than those found for the biological in situ scenario due to the pavement of the treatment area. The combined biological and chemical in situ scenario (3) was the worst in terms of secondary impacts while the pump and treat scenario (1) was the worst in terms of primary impacts. Two scenarios were selected: one based upon low environmental impacts and the other on the fastest treatment time.Conclusions. Even without excavation, an in situ treatment can generate more secondary impacts than an ex situ treatment. Low environmental impact scenarios require time while rapid treatment scenarios generate high environmental impacts. The selection of the best remediation scenario will depend on the site owner's priority.Recommendations. Better characterization factors for aggregated substances are required.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 014181214

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1065/lca2007.05.328


Related references

Selection of bacteria and plant seeds for potential use in the remediation of diesel contaminated soils. Journal of Basic Microbiology 45(4): 251-256, 2005

Site complexities and the selection of a remediation system for petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated site, central New Jersey. Ground Water Management 16: 299-308, 1993

The economics of contaminated site remediation; decision making and technology selection. Engineering Geology Special Publication: ages 63-71. 1998., 1998

Classification, application and selection of contaminated site remediation technology an overview. Research Of Environmental Sciences: 2, 202, 2008

A pilot study for the selection of a bioreactor for remediation of groundwater from a coal tar contaminated site. Journal of Hazardous Materials 89(2-3): 241-252, 28 January, 2002

A pilot study for the selection of a bioreactor for remediation of groundwater from a coal tar contaminated site. Journal of Hazardous Materials 89(2-3): 241-252, 2001

Combining diesel-contaminated soil and anhydrous ammonia-contaminated soil to measure the effectiveness of total petroleum hydrocarbon remediation. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 33(Pages 47-50, 2004

Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soils: An Overview of Site Remediation Techniques. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 41(10): 879-914, 2011

Environmental impacts of remediation of a trichloroethene-contaminated site: life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives. Environmental Science & Technology 44(23): 9163-9169, 2011

Remediation options for diesel-contaminated soil. Hydrocarbon contaminated soils: Volume 1 Remediation techniques, environmental fate, risk assessment, analytical methodologies, regulatory considerations: 181-191, 1991

Remediation of simulated soils contaminated with diesel. Journal of Environmental Engineering New York 125(1): 36-46, 1999

Remediation of diesel-oil-contaminated soil using peat. Energy Sources 21(9): 785-799, 1999

Is there an environmental benefit from remediation of a contaminated site? Combined assessments of the risk reduction and life cycle impact of remediation. Journal of Environmental Management 112: 392-403, 2013

Remediation of diesel-contaminated soil using full-scale SVE. In situ and on site bioremediation 2003 Proceedings of the Seventh International In Situ and On Site Bioremediation Symposium, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2-5 June, 2003: E04, 2004

Investigation and remediation of a pond contaminated by diesel fuel. Annual Meeting - Association of Engineering Geologists 29: 47, 1986