+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of body size evaluations of obesity surgery patients and general population adults



A comparison of body size evaluations of obesity surgery patients and general population adults



Obesity Research 7(3): 281-287



RAND, COLLEEN S. W., JAQUELYN LISS RESNIK, AND ALEX M. C. MACGREGOR. A comparison of body size evaluations of obesity surgery patients and general population adults. Obes Res.Objective: To compare post‐operative obesity surgery patients and general population adults in their assessments of a wide range of body sizes.Research Methods and Procedures: Obesity surgery patients (n = 274) and general population adults (n = 326) rated ideal and socially acceptable body sizes in separate arrays of babies, children, young adults, and middle‐aged and older adults. Nine line figure drawings ranging from very thin to very obese were rated for each array.Results: Both groups selected the same ideal body size for all arrays except for babies. Both groups rejected obese and very thin body sizes as socially acceptable. However, the obesity surgery patients were more restrictive than general population adults in their ratings of socially acceptable body sizes. Current obesity status did not impact ratings for the patient or general population subjects. In the patient sample, time since surgery did not influence body size evaluations.Discussion: The study of body size ratings limited only to the “ideal” size may be misleading because it may mask subtle but meaningful differences between groups. The consistent difference in more restrictive ratings of obesity surgery patients compared to general population adults may be due to patients' greater psychological investment in endorsing the societal ideal body size. It may also be due to patients' status as peripheral group members of the normal weight community. The inability of some patients to maintain their post‐operative weight loss may be particularly problematic for those who have defined “socially acceptable” body size most narrowly.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 014845685

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10348499

DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00407.x


Related references

Body size preferences and desired weight of patients who have received obesity surgery and of comparison adults. Obesity Research 3(5): 427-434, 1995

Morbid obesity: a comparison between a general population and obesity surgery patients. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 17(11): 657-661, 1993

Attitudes towards obesity in the Swedish general population: the role of one's own body size, weight satisfaction, and controllability beliefs about obesity. Body Image 11(1): 43-50, 2014

Association between Body Mass Index and Health-Related Quality of Life: The "Obesity Paradox" in 21,218 Adults of the Chinese General Population. Plos one 10(6): E0130613, 2015

Validity of silhouette showcards as a measure of body size and obesity in a population in the African region: A practical research tool for general-purpose surveys. Population Health Metrics 13: 35, 2015

Comparison of the increase in body size between 1899 and 1970 in a specially selected group with that in the general population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 37(1): 135-141, 1972

The night eating syndrome in the general population and among postoperative obesity surgery patients. International Journal of Eating Disorders 22(1): 65-69, 1997

The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients undergoing nonbariatric general surgery. Annals of Surgery 250(1): 166-172, 2009

Life chances after surgery of congenital heart disease: the influence of cardiac surgery on intergenerational social mobility. A comparison between patients and general population data. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 14(1): 128-134, 2007

Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care. Quality and Safety in Health Care 11(4): 315-319, 2002

Anxiety and depression in adults with cystic fibrosis: a comparison between patients and the general population in Sweden and three other European countries. Bmc Pulmonary Medicine 15: 121, 2015

Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 236(2): 565-571, 2005

Body image and quality of life in patients with and without body contouring surgery following bariatric surgery: a comparison of pre- and post-surgery groups. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1310, 2014