+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A new ELISA kit which uses a combination of Plasmodium falciparum extract and recombinant Plasmodium vivax antigens as an alternative to IFAT for detection of malaria antibodies



A new ELISA kit which uses a combination of Plasmodium falciparum extract and recombinant Plasmodium vivax antigens as an alternative to IFAT for detection of malaria antibodies



Malaria Journal 6: 19



The methods most commonly used to measure malarial antibody titres are the Indirect Fluorescence Antibody Test (IFAT), regarded as the gold standard, and the Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA). The objective here was to assess the diagnostic performance, i.e. the sensitivity and specificity, of a new malaria antibody ELISA kit in comparison to IFAT. This new ELISA kit, the ELISA malaria antibody test (DiaMed), uses a combination of crude soluble Plasmodium falciparum extract and recombinant Plasmodium vivax antigens. Two groups were used: 95 samples from malaria patients to assess the clinical sensitivity and 2,152 samples from blood donors, who had not been exposed to malaria, to assess the clinical specificity. The DiaMed ELISA test kit had a clinical sensitivity of 84.2% and a clinical specificity of 99.6% as compared with 70.5% and 99.6% respectively, using the IFAT method. The ELISA method was more sensitive than the IFAT method for P. vivax infections (75% vs. 25%). However, in 923 malaria risk donors the analytical sensitivity of the ELISA test was 40% and its specificity 98.3%, performances impaired by large numbers of equivocal results non-concordant between ELISA and IFAT. When the overall analytical performances of ELISA was compared to IFAT, the ELISA efficiency J index was 0.84 versus 0.71 for IFAT. Overall analytical sensitivity was 93.1% and the analytical specificity 96.7%. Overall agreement between the two methods reached 0.97 with a reliability k index of 0.64. The DiaMed ELISA test kit shows a good correlation with IFAT for analytical and clinical parameters. It may be an interesting method to replace the IFAT especially in blood banks, but further extensive investigations are needed to examine the analytical performance of the assay, especially in a blood bank setting.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 014873946

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17313669

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-19


Related references

Soluble antigens of plasmodium gallinaceum chicken human monkey rat cattle plasmodium falciparum plasmodium vivax plasmodium malariae plasmodium knowlesi plasmodium cynomolgi plasmodium berghei treponema pallidum leptospira pomona babesia bovis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 62(1): 51-57, 1968

Differential cellular recognition of antigens during acute Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. Journal of Infectious Diseases 203(8): 1192-1199, 2011

The indirect hemagglutination test for malaria. Evaluation of antigens prepared from Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 24(3): 417-421, 1975

Cross reacting antigens to pc96 a protective antigen of plasmodium chabaudi in plasmodium falciparum plasmodium vivax and plasmodium cynomolgi. American Journal of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 40(6): 579-584, 1989

Cytotoxic antibodies during Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. Nouvelle Presse Medicale7, 10(28): 2370, 1981

Field evaluation of the ICT malaria P.f/P.v immunochromatographic test for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis of malaria in eastern Indonesia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37(8): 2412-2417, 1999

Antibodies against sporozoite of Plasmodium gallinaceum in sera from individuals with past acute malaria in endemic areas of Plasmodium falciparum and P vivax and in focal areas of P vivax transmission. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 93(SUPPL 2): 214, 1998

Membrane antigens of sporozoites of plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax identified by mono clonal antibodies. Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology (SUPPL): 21-22, 1982

Production of monoclonal antibodies against a 19-kD recombinant Plasmodium vivax MSP1 for detection of P. vivax malaria in Turkey. Hybridoma and Hybridomics 23(2): 133-136, 2004

IgG antibodies to synthetic GPI are biomarkers of immune-status to both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in young children. Malaria Journal 16(1): 386, 2018

Country-wide assessment of the genetic polymorphism in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax antigens detected with rapid diagnostic tests for malaria. Malaria Journal 7: 219, 2008

Detection of sporozoites of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum in mosquitoes by ELISA: false positivity associated with bovine and swine blood. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 87(3): 322-324, 1993

Comparative analysis at the nucleotide level of the genes encoding the lactate dehydrogenase enzyme of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum Plasmodium vivax ve Plasmodium falciparum un laktat dehidrogenaz enzimini kodlayan genlerinin nukleotid duzeyinde karsilastirmali analizi. Turkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, 293: 149-153, 2005

Recognition of Plasmodium falciparum asexual stage antigens by antibodies in sera from people exposed to Plasmodium vivax. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 47(4): 422-428, 1992

Antibodies to plasmodium falciparum ring infected erythrocyte surface antigen and plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax circumsporozoite proteins. Medical Science Research 19(11): 345-350, 1991