+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluating holistic environmental consequences of brownfield management options using consequential life cycle assessment for different perspectives



Evaluating holistic environmental consequences of brownfield management options using consequential life cycle assessment for different perspectives



Environmental Management 40(2): 323-337



Brownfields are abandoned, idled, or underused sites whose reuse necessitates some sort of intervention. These sites are largely urban and are frequently contaminated. Brownfield management options can be associated with three types of environmental consequences: those resulting from changes in the site's environmental quality (primary impacts); those resulting from the actual intervention stage (secondary impacts); and, if the vocation of the site changes, those resulting from effects on regional land use (tertiary impacts). Different stakeholders and decision-making contexts will place a different importance on each of these types of impacts. This article proposes a framework for comparing brownfield management options in regard to these three types of environmental impacts and for interpreting these results from different perspectives. The assessment framework is based on consequential life cycle assessment (LCA), which is shown to provide environmental information on the three types of impacts. The results for a case study are presented, where a "rehabilitation" option allowing residential redevelopment is compared to an "exposure minimization" option not resulting in the site being reused. Calculated primary and tertiary impacts are favorable to the rehabilitation option, whereas secondary impacts are favorable to the exposure minimization option. A ternary diagram presents the favorable option for different stereotypical perspectives. Tertiary impacts are much greater than secondary impacts, and consequently all perspectives that consider tertiary impacts favor rehabilitation. The perspective that considers primary and secondary impacts receives conflicting information. The ternary diagram, showing results for all perspectives, could possibly be useful for consensus-building among stakeholders.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 015740384

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17602258

DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0328-6


Related references

Evaluation of the environmental impact of Brownfield remediation options: comparison of two life cycle assessment-based evaluation tools. Environmental Technology 33(19-21): 2447-2459, 2013

Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 7(5): 1034-1049, 2015

Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 7(6): 1305-1320, 2015

Evaluating greenhouse gas impacts of organic waste management options using life cycle assessment. Waste Management and Research 30(8): 800-812, 2012

Environmental assessment of Brownfield rehabilitation using two different life cycle inventory models. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6): 391-398, 2007

Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environmental Science & Technology 37(11): 2600-2608, 2003

Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25(1): 838-854, 2018

Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant. Journal of Environmental Management 175: 20-32, 2016

Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment. Science of the Total Environment 560-561: 241-253, 2016

Consequential life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of an increased rapemethylester (RME) production in Switzerland. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(6): 2361-2373, 2011

The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: A life cycle assessment study. Chemical Engineering Journal 96(1-3): 207-222, 15 December, 2003

Environmental performance of manure co-digestion with natural and cultivated grass A consequential life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 162: 1135-1143, 2017

Assessing the Environmental Impact of Flax Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite from a Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Perspective. Sustainability 7(9): 11462-11483, 2015

Consequential environmental and economic life cycle assessment of green and gray stormwater infrastructures for combined sewer systems. Environmental Science and Technology 47(19): 11189-11198, 2013

Environmental impacts of producing bioethanol and biobased lactic acid from standalone and integrated biorefineries using a consequential and an attributional life cycle assessment approach. Science of the Total Environment 598: 497-512, 2017