+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Flock foraging in nectar-feeding bats: advantages to the bats and to the host plants



Flock foraging in nectar-feeding bats: advantages to the bats and to the host plants



American Naturalist 1141: 23-49



Advantages of conspecific associations for pollinating bats and their host plants are discussed. Bats forage in cohesive but structureless flocks which search more efficiently and exploit plant patches more thoroughly than would individuals. Communal feeding allows intermittent communal roosting which affords more efficient digestion. By following lead bats to new plants without individually confirming resource depletion, all bats save energy. There is also saving in echolocation energy since only leading bats use sonar. Caloric allotments to various activities are presented. Leptonycteris uses a disproportionate amount of energy in a short foraging period. Individual foraging energetics depend on flock characteristics. A model is given for maximum flock size determination. Symbiont agaves ensure pollen transfer by steeply declining nocturnal nectar flow. Evolution of the association is discussed, with speculations on grouping advantages for bats and plants prior to mutualistic interactions. Flexibility in the system is a safety factor reducing the destabilizing effect of one-to-one obligate interactions.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 015847759

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/2460287


Related references

Flock foraging in nectar feeding bats leptonycteris sanborni advantages to the bats and to the host plants. American Naturalist 114(1): 23-50, 1979

Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar. Royal Society Open Science 3(8): 160199, 2016

Foraging behavior of malaysian nectar feeding bats. Biotropica 10(3): 184-193, 1978

Flight speed and body mass of nectar-feeding bats (Glossophaginae) during foraging. Journal of Experimental Biology 202(Pt 14): 1917-1930, 1999

Energetic cost of hovering flight in nectar-feeding bats (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) and its scaling in moths, birds and bats. Journal of Comparative Physiology B Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology 169(1): 38-48, 1999

Spatiotemporal dependence on CAM plants in Venezuelan arid zone nectar-feeding bats. Bat Research News 41(4): 131, Winter, 2000

The effects of hummingbird feeders on nectar-feeding bats and their resource plants in southeastern Arizona. Bat Research News 41(4): 119, Winter, 2000

Morphological specialization influences nectar extraction efficiency of sympatric nectar-feeding bats. Journal of Experimental Biology 215(Pt 22): 3989-3996, 2012

Nectar feeding strategies of pteropodid bats on Parkia biglandulosa: the influence of angular variations in nectar rings. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 73(3): 127-135, 2007

Foraging behavior adjustments related to changes in nectar sugar concentration in phyllostomid bats. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A Molecular and Integrative Physiology 160(2): 143-148, 2011

Nectar feeding bats. Animal Kingdom 71(3): 10-12, 1968

New world nectar-feeding bats. 1998

Communities of nectar-pollen foraging bats from the Bosque de Galeria forest of the Sierra de la Macrena, Colombia. Caldasia 17(82-85): 459-461, 1995

A collaborative effort to restore feeding areas for nectar-feeding bats in Tamaulipas, Mexico. Bat Research News 43(4): 170-171, Winter, 2002

The aversive effect of electromagnetic radiation on foraging bats: a possible means of discouraging bats from approaching wind turbines. Plos one 4(7): E6246, 2009