Making the software choice: Decision points for choosing farm accounting software with a comparison of six major programs
Grant, J.
AgriComp 334-39
1984
Accession: 016310372
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Buffington, D.E.; Lampasona, V.; Chandler, M.H. 1993: Computers in pharmacokinetics. Choosing software for clinical decision making Clinical Pharmacokinetics 25(3): 205-216Avina, J 2008: Making the Right Choice: The Guide to Choosing the Best Desktop Utility Bill Tracking Software for Your Facility Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 27(4): 20-35
Goodarzi Pour, D.; Razmi, H.; Jabedar Maralani, S.; Zeighami, S. 2008: New software: comparison between three software programs for root canal length measurement Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 37(4): 228-231
Huang, S.J.; Lin, C.Y.; Chiu, N.H. 2006: Fuzzy decision tree approach for embedding risk assessment information into software cost estimation model : Software Engineering and Software Journal of Information Science and Engineering 22(2): 297-313
Grapin, G.; Messina, A. 2010: Logiciel d'aide à la décision pour le choix d'un diamètre économique en transport d'eau potable et industrielle - Decision-making software to optimise the choice of pipe diameter for cost-effective delivery of drinking and industrial water L' Eau, l'Industrie, les Nuisances (330): 91-94
Hollman, C.; Paulden, M.; Pechlivanoglou, P.; McCabe, C. 2017: A Comparison of Four Software Programs for Implementing Decision Analytic Cost-Effectiveness Models Pharmacoeconomics 35(8): 817-830
McNairn, J.A.; McNairn, I.S. 1986: The choice is yours! Part one: Choosing your software Nursing Rsa 1(8): 43-47
Peres, K.E. 2007: Choosing software for smaller providers. How agency size affects software selection Behavioral Healthcare 27(11): 48-49
Waldie, B. 1989: Accounting software: the answer to better farm records? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 37(4 (I)): 727-732
Olson, K.D. 1987: Improving the evaluation of farm accounting software Staff Papers Series, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota (87-5): 18pp + a
Kent, C.S.; Milligan, R.A.; Knoblauch, W.A. 1984: Criteria for and evaluation of selected on-farm accounting software Publication, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University (A.E.Res. 84-14): ii + 81
Cupia, M.; Molenda, K. 2003: Usefulness evaluation of accounting programs for the needs of mechanization following PORR software example Inzynieria Rolnicza 7(10): 207-211
Griffith, D.A. 1988: Economics and accounting, problems with current farm management software Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computers in Agricultural Extension Programs Fedro S Zazueta AB Del Bottcher eds: 322
Milligan, R.; Kent, C.; Knoblauch, W. 1985: Criteria for and evaluation of selected on-farm computer accounting software Cornell agricultural economics staff paper Dept of Agricultural Economics Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station: 985 (85-13)
Shrier, I.; Lamme, E.; Deschenes, E. 2014: Sport medicine surveillance 101: What clinicians need to know when choosing software programs to record injuries and illnesses Current Sports Medicine Reports 13(5): 341-348