+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential



Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential



Plant Physiology 53(3): 360-365



Diurnal changes in the vertical profiles of irradiance incident upon the adaxial leaf surface (I), leaf resistance (r(1)), leaf water potential (psi), osmotic potential (pi), and turgor potential (P) were followed concurrently in crops of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Pa602A), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench cv. RS 610), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Havanna Seed 211) on several days in 1968 to 1970 when soil water potentials were low. The r(1), measured with a ventilated diffusion porometer, of the leaves in the upper canopy decreased temporarily after sunrise [ approximately 0530 hours Eastern Standard Time] as I increased, but then r(1) increased again between 0700 and 0830 hr Eastern Standard Time as the psi, measured with a pressure chamber, decreased rapidly from the values of -7, -4 and -6 bars at sunrise to minimal values of -18, -22 and -15 bars near midday in the maize, sorghum, and tobacco, respectively. The pi, measured with a vapor pressure osmometer, also decreased after sunrise, but not to the same degree as the decrease in psi, so that a P of zero was reached in some leaves between 0730 and 0800 hours. The lower (more negative) pi of leaves in the upper canopy than those in the lower canopy gave the upper leaves a higher P at a given psi than the lower leaves in all three species; leaves at intermediate heights had an intermediate P. This difference between leaves at the three heights in the canopy was maintained at all values of psi. The r(1) remained unchanged over a wide range of P and then increased markedly at a P of 2 bars in maize, -1 bar in sorghum, and near zero P in tobacco: r(1) also remained constant until psi decreased to -17, -20, and -13 bars in leaves at intermediate heights in maize, sorghum, and tobacco, respectively. In all three species r(1) of leaves in the upper canopy increased at more negative values of psi than those at the base of the canopy, and in tobacco, leaves in the upper canopy wilted at more negative values of psi than those in the lower canopy.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 017132368

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16658706

DOI: 10.1104/pp.53.3.360


Related references

Stomatal behavior and water status of maize sorghum and tobacco under field conditions part 2 at low soil water potential. Plant Physiology 53(3): 360-365, 1974

Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: I. At High Soil Water Potential. Plant Physiology 51(1): 31-36, 1973

Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions. I. At High Soil Water Potential. Plant Physiology 51(1): 31-36, 1973

Stomatal behavior and water status of maize sorghum and tobacco under field conditions part 1 at high soil water potential. Plant Physiology 51(1): 31-36, 1973

Concurrent comparisons of stomatal behavior, water status, and evaporation of maize in soil at high or low water potential. Plant Physiology 55(5): 932-936, 1975

Relationship between stomatal conductance, leaf water potential and soil water potential in a maize field: effect of soil compaction. Monograph British Society for Plant Growth Regulation ( 21): 303-306, 1990

Stomatal movement and water relations in crops part 2 stomatal behavior of tobacco leaves of different ages and the influence of soil water shortage. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 42(1): 123-130, 1973

Lack of relationship between leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in cowpea, maize and sorghum under progressive water stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry New Delhi 23(1): 38-41, 1996

Water status stomatal resistance and transpiration with relation to different levels of water deficit in maize tomato tobacco and sugar beet. Rivista di Agronomia 14(3): 210-220, 1980

Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf water potential turgor potential and relative water content in field grown soybean and maize. Crop Science 27(5): 984-990, 1987

Relationship between soil water status predawn leaf water potential and other indicators of the plant water status in maize. Agronomie (Paris) 10(8): 617-626, 1990

Effects of soil water stress on stomatal diffusion conductance and leaf water potential in maize zea mays l. at flowering stage. Water S A 17(4): 255-262, 1991

Diurnal transpiration rate stomatal aperture stomatal conductance xylem water potential and leaf water potential in rice plants under different growth conditions. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 50(1): 25-37, 1981

Shoot hydraulic characteristics, plant water status and stomatal response in olive trees under different soil water conditions. Plant and Soil 373(1-2): 77-87, 2013

Stomatal movement and water relations in crops. 2. Stomatal behaviour of tobacco leaves of different ages and the influence of soil water shortage. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Japan 42(1): 123-130, 1973