+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Toxicity testing with communities: microcosms, mesocosms, and whole-system manipulations



Toxicity testing with communities: microcosms, mesocosms, and whole-system manipulations



Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 147: 45-69



Present ecotoxicological methodology is not adequate for providing evidence for decisions on sustainable use of the planet, maintenance of ecosystem services, or ecosystem health. However, particularly in the area of ecosystem health, promising beginnings have been made. Presumably, if ecosystems are maintained in robust health, then sustainability and reliable delivery of ecosystem services should result. On the other hand, one cannot ignore either human population size or expectations of affluence. Whether the number of ecosystems in robust health will be adequate for appropriate delivery of ecosystem services not only for existing generations but for future generations still has very unacceptably high levels of uncertainty. All ecosystems are dynamic, and one of the problems will be distinguishing normal cyclical or successional changes from trends away from established norms. Furthermore, toxicity tests are extremely useful for determining deleterious effects and those concentrations at which no-observable-deleterious effects occur. They are not suitable for determining how successfully various materials are being reincorporated into natural systems without disturbing ecological integrity. In a very real sense, however, this is a toxicological problem because, like vitamins and other essential materials for humans, excessive amounts of at least some types can be deleterious as can other materials such as ordinary table salt. It seems inevitable that different criteria, standards, endpoints, and methodologies that revolve around sustainability, ecosystem services, and reincorporating extracted and manufactured materials into natural systems following their use by human society will be required. Furthermore, ecosystems are different, both structurally and functionally, in different climatic zones, different altitudes, different soil conditions, and the like. Therefore, widespread uniform standards seem unlikely to function well, particularly for toxic materials. Prescriptive legislation, as opposed to that requiring site-specific professional judgment, is not likely to serve well under these circumstances. How success will be determined, how deleterious effects will be supported by evidence, and how effective extrapolations from one system to another will be are just a few of the many questions that need resolution. Finally, both temporal and spatial scales of systems under examination must increase, as will the diversity of information used as a basis for professional judgment. All of these factors are occurring in other areas of human societies, increasing globalization, and entry into the information age. Thus, the trends for ecotoxicology are in many ways quite similar to those in other professions as well.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 018188097

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8776985


Related references

A review of the use of invertebrate communities in lotic microcosms and mesocosms to assess the toxicity of chemicals. Bulletin of the North American Benthological Society: Pages 101. 1991., 1991

Response of bacterial and viral communities to nutrient manipulations in seawater mesocosms. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 31(2): 109-121, 2003

Toxicity and hazard of a mixture of SSRIs to zooplankton communities evaluated in aquatic microcosms. Chemosphere 69(6): 949-954, 2007

Oil degradation in microcosms and mesocosms. Hinchee, R E, Vogel, C M, Brockman, F J Bioremediation, 3 (8); Microbial processes for bioremediation 101-116, 1995

Monitoring and effects of nicosulfuron in aquatic mesocosms: development of a simple analytical procedure and evidence for low toxicity to phytoplankton communities. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 382(1): 108-114, 2005

Testing metacommunity concepts with density manipulations of Pen shell communities. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting Abstracts 88: 245, 2003

Establishing and maintaining laboratory based microcosms of riffle insect communities their potential for multispecies toxicity tests. Hydrobiologia 175(1): 49-60, 1989

The role of terrestrial microcosms and mesocosms in ecotoxicologic research. Levin, S A , Et Al (Ed ) Springer Advanced Texts in Life Sciences: Ecotoxicology: Problems And Approaches Xiii+547p Springer-Verlag New York, Inc : Secaucus, New Jersey, Usa; Berlin, West Germany Illus Maps 367-410, 1989

Acute toxicity of methyl-parathion in wetland mesocosms: assessing the influence of aquatic plants using laboratory testing with Hyalella azteca. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 45(3): 331-336, 2003

Microbial community-level toxicity testing of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in aquatic microcosms. Fems Microbiology Ecology 49(2): 229-241, 2004

Effects of invertebrate predators and a pesticide on temporary pond microcosms used for aquatic toxicity testing. Environmental Pollution 131(1): 25-34, 2004

Use of microcosms and mesocosms for investigating pesticide fate and effects in aquatic ecosystems. Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society 223(1-2): AGRO 24, 2002

Lessons learned in the construction and operation of coral reef microcosms and mesocosms. Unknown, 2006

Mesocosms' and microcosms' utilization for ecotoxicity evaluation of dichloromethane a chlorinated solvent. Chemosphere 24(1): 37-50, 1992

Using statistical power to optimize sensitivity of analysis of variance designs for microcosms and mesocosms. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry 18(2): 113-117, 1999