+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Advantages and disadvantages of bordeaux mixture and of lime-sulphur used on apples in the growing season
Observations on the Umaria marine bed
10 years of hearing conservation in the Royal Air Force
Chocolate crumb - dairy ingredient for milk chocolate
Effect of daily gelatin ingestion on human scalp hair
Comparison of rice bran and maize bran as feeds for growing and fattening pigs
The composition of pampas-grass (Cortaderia argentea.)
The Accraian Series:
The mechanism of the Liebermann-Burchard reaction of sterols and triterpenes and their esters
Cerebrovascular Doppler ultrasound studies (cv-Doppler)
Toria: PT-303 - first national variety
Hair growth promoting activity of tridax procumbens
Productivity of Pekin x Khaki Campbell ducks
A stable cytosolic expression of VH antibody fragment directed against PVY NIa protein in transgenic potato plant confers partial protection against the virus
Solar treatment of wheat loose smut
Swimmers itch in the Lake of Garda
Bactofugation and the Bactotherm process
The effects of prefrontal lobotomy on aggressive behavior in dogs
Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm
Breakdown of seamounts at the trench axis, viewed from gravity anomaly
Kooken; pennsylvania's toughest cave
Recovery of new dinosaur and other fossils from the Early Cretaceous Arundel Clay facies (Potomac Group) of central Maryland, U.S.A
Zubor horny (Bison bonasus) v prirodnych podmienkach Slovensku
The extended Widal test in the diagnosis of fevers due to Salmonella infection
Hair of the american mastodon indicates an adaptation to a semi aquatic habitat

Use of a risk communication model to evaluate dietetics professionals' viewpoints on genetically engineered foods and crops

Use of a risk communication model to evaluate dietetics professionals' viewpoints on genetically engineered foods and crops

Journal of the American Dietetic Association 106(5): 719-727

ISSN/ISBN: 0002-8223

PMID: 16647331

DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.008

The complex issues surrounding the application of genetic engineering to food and agriculture have generated a contentious debate among diverse interest groups. One pervasive dimension in the resultant discourse is the varying perceptions of the risks and benefits of genetically engineered foods and crops. In the risk communication model, technical information is evaluated within the context of an individual's values and perceptions.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 018200516

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

The allergenicity of genetically modified foods from genetically engineered crops: A narrative and systematic review. Annals of Allergy Asthma and Immunology: Official Publication of the American College of Allergy Asthma and Immunology 119(3): 214-222.E3, 2017

Health professionals hold positive attitudes toward biotechnology and genetically engineered foods. Journal of Environmental Health 67(10): 44-49, 2005

Regulation of foods derived from genetically engineered crops. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 10(3): 298-302, 1999

Moving from debate to dialogue about genetically engineered foods and crops: Insights from a Land Grant University. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 18(2-3): 167-201, 2001

Risk-Only Assessment of Genetically Engineered Crops Is Risky. Trends in Plant Science 24(1): 58-68, 2019

Value judgments and risk comparisons. The case of genetically engineered crops. Plant Physiology 132(1): 10-16, 2003

Releasing genetically engineered virus resistant crops Risk assessment. Hadidi, A , Khetarpal, R K , Koganezawa, H Plant virus disease control 142-153, 1998

Involvement of local dietetics professionals in risk communication program on food safety in municipal governments and their attitude towards the program. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Hygiene 64(1): 32-40, 2009

Risk assessment of genetically engineered crops: fitness effects of virus-resistance transgenes in wild Cucurbita pepo. Ecological Applications: a Publication of the Ecological Society of America 19(5): 1091-1101, 2009

The Production and Uses of Genetically Transformed Plants || Commercialization of Genetically Engineered Crops. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 342(1301): 287-291, 1993

Performance of Daphnia magna on flour, leaves, and pollen from different maize lines: Implications for risk assessment of genetically engineered crops. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 212: 111967, 2021

Social Risk Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods of Engineers in Training: Application of a Comprehensive Risk Model. Science and Engineering Ethics 26(2): 641-665, 2020

Making effective use of existing data for case-by-case risk assessments of genetically engineered crops. Journal of Applied Entomology 133(8): 571-583, 2009

The hazards of genetically engineered foods. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(3): A146-A147, 2006

Are genetically engineered foods safe?. Nutrition 10(5): 431, 1994