EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Comparison of analytical and numerical models for predicting active layer characteristics



Comparison of analytical and numerical models for predicting active layer characteristics



Program and Abstracts - Arctic Science Conference 47: 43-44




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 018589989

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Numerical calculations of space charge layer effects in nanocrystalline ceria. Part I: comparison with the analytical models and derivation of improved analytical solutions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 16(21): 10214-10231, 2014

Analytical and numerical models for predicting soil forces on narrow tillage tools - a review. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 35(3): 183-193, 1993

A comparison of analytical and numerical methods of predicting the freezing times of foods. Journal of Food Science 42(5): 1390-1395, 1977

Predicting playing frequencies for clarinets: A comparison between numerical simulations and simplified analytical formulas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138(5): 2770-2781, 2015

Comparison between numerical and analytical solution of solute transport models. Journal of African Earth Sciences 55.1-2, 2009

Comparison of selected analytical and numerical pesticide transport models. American Water Resources Association Technical Publication Series TPS Pages 133-142, 1997

Comparison of numerical and analytical models of unsaturated flow around underground openings. Mining Engineering 53(12): 45-48, 2001

The electric double layer inside a spherical aqueous cavity a comparison between exact numerical and approximate analytical solutions. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science 102(2): 337-347, 1984

Error-analysis and comparison to analytical models of numerical waveforms produced by the NRAR Collaboration. Classical and Quantum Gravity 31(2): 025012, 2013

Flow in unsaturated random porous media, nonlinear numerical analysis and comparison to analytical stochastic models. Advances in water resources, 22(3): 257-272, 1998

Comparison of FDTD numerical computations and analytical multipole expansion method for plasmonics-active nanosphere dimers. Optics Express 17(12): 9688-9703, 2009

Fold shape and rheology; a comparison between numerical and physical models of single-layer buckle folds. Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 25(6): 406, 1993

Temporal characteristics of resonant surface polaritons in superlensing planar double-negative slabs: development of analytical schemes and numerical models. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 76(4 Pt 2): 046606-046606, 2007

Boundary-layer flow over analytical two-dimensional hills: A systematic comparison of different models with wind tunnel data. Boundary Layer Meteorology 63(3): 259-291, 1993

Comparison of wind speeds obtained using numerical weather prediction models and topographic exposure indices for predicting windthrow in mountainous terrain. Forest Ecology and Management 254(2): 193-204, 2008