EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Development and comparison of finite-element and finite difference models at an electro osmosis remediation test site



Development and comparison of finite-element and finite difference models at an electro osmosis remediation test site



Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America 33(1): 23



Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is located near the southeast end of the Livermore Valley. The LLNL site is underlain by the Livermore Fm. comprised of an upper and lower member. The upper member is characterized by gravel, sand, silt, and clay, and is host to the underlying contaminant plumes. In 1982, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were discovered in the ground water and a thorough investigation began of the subsurface hydrology, geology, and chemistry. In 1987, LLNL was placed on the Superfund National Priority List. The East Traffic Circle Area is of interest because it was an unpaved parking apron between the runways of the Naval Air Station prior to 1951. These aprons were used to clean and repair airplanes. In 1984, the same area revealed landfill debris containing materials such as metal shavings, capacitors (containing PCBs), broken bottles, drums (containing chemical wastes), plating tank contents, and sandblasting sand. Pump-and-treat remedial procedures have been implemented to remove contamination from the coarse subsurface sediments, but the problem of recalcitrant contaminants remains to be solved for the less permeable zones. An experimental method of contaminant removal, Electro Osmosis (EO), has begun in the finer grained sediments and my goal is to evaluate the performance of this innovative remedial procedure. A simple flow model was constructed using the finite-element program, FlexPDE, to help understand the hydraulic communication that occurs between wells in the test site under pumping conditions. This poster describes the hydraulic test information used in the study and compares the results from the finite-element model to those obtained from a finite-difference model created in MODFLOW. The next step is to create a coupled model that includes transport of the contaminant through low-permeable units. These estimations will then be compared to EO predictive analyses and used to evaluate future EO remediation design and operation.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 018718653

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Comparison of three-dimensional finite difference and finite element transport models with application to a groundwater remediation site in western Nebraska. 1990

Models of near-field spectroscopic studies: comparison between Finite-Element and Finite-Difference methods. Optics Express 13(21): 8483-8497, 2005

Modelling of electromagnetic induction for two-dimensional structures by the finite element method; comparison of the results obtained using the finite element and finite difference methods for a model of the Carpathians. Acta Geophysica Polonica 30(2): 153-165, 1982

Comparison of finite element and finite difference methods for nearshore advection-diffusion transport models. Pages (p 1, 1977

Finite element models for two-dimensional steady and transient groundwater flow-programs, case studies, and comparison with finite difference method. 1984

Impact of cyclonic wind field on interaction of surge “wave computations using finite-element and finite-difference models. 2008

Comparison of finite difference and finite element solutions to the variably saturated flow equation. Journal of hydrology, 270(1-2): 49-64, 2003

Laterally loaded offshore piles; comparison of finite difference and finite element analyses. Pages III: 69-74:, 1981

Comparison of finite difference and finite element methods for simulating two-dimensional scattering of elastic waves. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 171.1-4, 2008

Finite element analysis of square aquifers containing pumped wells and comparison with finite difference method. Nordic Hydrology 14(2): 85-92, 1983

Comparison of finite difference and finite element methods. Pages 899-952:, 1984

A finite element formulation of frequency-dependent electro-osmosis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 290(2): 574-581, 2005

Comparison of a finite-difference code to a finite-element code in modeling an excavation in an underground shaft pillar. Pages 608-619 1989, 1989

Tillage tool design by the finite element method. 2. Experimental validation of the finite element results with soil bin test. Journal of agricultural engineering research 72(1): 53-58, 1999

Nonlinear analysis of ground by 2D finite element-finite difference hybrid method. Pages 831-838 1998, 1998