+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Magnitude distribution versus local seismic hazard

Magnitude distribution versus local seismic hazard

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(3): 1091-1098

In seismic hazard analysis there are quantities that are dominated by the distribution of strong earthquakes. A typical example is the peak ground acceleration with a 500-year return period at a specific site. This quantity, a(500), is particularly important from the engineering point of view. Due to the scanty number of strong earthquakes in seismic catalogs, the available data are generally not sufficient for a statistical validation of a magnitude distribution model. Different models can explain available data with the same level of statistical likelihood, even if they lead, ceteris paribus, to values of a(500) at the site that are significantly different. Which one is more credible and should be favored for seismic hazard analysis at the considered site? In most cases the traditional fitting tests do not give a meaningful answer. In this article we introduce a particular definition of credibility of a magnitude model, based on the distribution of expected errors in the evaluation of a(500) at a specific site. We show that this concept of credibility is a useful tool for selecting the more appropriate of two competing models.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 019361467

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1785/0120010284

Related references

Input parameter sensitivity of hazard, magnitude distribution, and moment-rate for the California seismic hazard model. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 79(45, Suppl, 1998

Hazard uncertainty maps and predominant seismic source distance and magnitude maps for a seismic hazard analysis of Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura counties, California. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 76(46, Suppl, 1995

Resampling methods for evaluating the uncertainty of the nonparametric magnitude distribution estimation in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Tectonophysics 456.1-2, 2008

Local and duration magnitudes in northwestern Italy, and seismic moment versus magnitude relationships. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(2): 592-604, 2005

Earthquake magnitude or seismic moment in seismic hazard evaluation?. Pure and Applied Geophysics 127(1): 21-31, 1988

Assessment of seismic hazard for Jordan; a sensitivity study with respect to different seismic source and magnitude recurrence models. Seismological Research Letters 81.2, 2010

Studies of the local seismic hazard in areas with strategic buildings; applications of a new local law aimed at the reduction of the seismic risk. International Geological Congress, Abstracts = Congres Geologique International, Resumes 32, Part 2: 1341, 2004

Local magnitude, duration magnitude and seismic moment of Dahshour 1992 earthquakes. Annali di Geofisica 43(1): 95-103, 2000

On the accuracy of the mb-determination from the number of the reporting stations; lowering of the magnitude threshold and difference in the indexes of seismic hazard and seismic risk in the area of Greece. Pages 574-601 1981, 1981

Local magnitude, surface wave magnitude and seismic energy. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 35(4): 354-357, 1991

Relief distribution versus seismicity along the Sub-Himalayan Belt, NW India; inferences for the seismic hazard of the region. Geophysical Research Abstracts 12, 2010

Seismic hazard in Greece; I, Magnitude recurrence. Tectonophysics 117(3-4): 205-257, 1985

Empirical Calibration of Local Magnitude Data Sets Versus Moment Magnitude in Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103(4): 2227-2246, 2013

Effects of magnitude uncertainties on seismic hazard estimates. Proceedings of the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 12(2000, 2000

Scaling relations of local magnitude versus moment magnitude for sequences of similar earthquakes in Switzerland. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101.2, 2011