+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating



The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating



Chemical Geology 41(4): 285-317



Uranium dosimeter glasses SRM 612, CN1 and CN2 have been calibrated against Co monitors in 79 irradiations in the Herald reactor over seven years. Mean values of the calibration factors B for each glass are B612 = (5.736 ± 0.055)·109 (74 irradiations), BCN1 = (1.883 ± 0.026)·109 (21 irradiations) and BCN2 = (2.014 ± 0.0 26)·109 (21 irradiations). Comparison of relative responses of the four dosimeters reveals that unaccounted errors exist in the response of the Co monitors and, to a lesser extent, in the response of SRM 612. The errors associated with the response of the natural uranium glasses CN1 and CN2 are represented by conventional (Poisson) “counting statistics”. These results show that attempts to calibrate a uranium glass against an activation monitor in only a small number of irradiations may produce results radically discrepant from the true value. The importance of systematic errors in neutron dosimetry for fission-track dating is also discussed. An alternative zeta () calibration approach is described, which circumvents absolute and f evaluation: each dosimeter glass is calibrated repeatedly against zircon age standards from the Fish Canyon and Bishop tuffs, the Tardree rhyolite and Southern African kimberlites, to obtain empirical calibration factors . The weighted mean -values are 339 ± 5 for SRM 612, 113.0 ± 2.6 for CN1 and 121.0 ± 3.6 for CN2. Independent K/Ar, 40Ar/39Ar and Rb/Sr calibrating ages for the standards are discussed. For two of the three glasses, the presented -values derived from each of the zircon standards are consistent within error. Compatibility of the kimberlite data with that of the other samples is discussed. Age calculation by direct comparison of track density ratios in sample and standard is rejected as grossly imprecise. Examination of the reproducibility of results from repeated measurements indicates the conventional calculation of error to be reasonable, but shows the approach of Johnson et al. (1979) to give a serious over-estimate of precision.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 020475220

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(83)80026-6


Related references

Determination of zeta calibration constant for fission track dating. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 13(2-3): 127-130, 1987

Zeta calibration values for fission track dating with a diallyl phthalate detector. Chishitsugaku Zasshi = Journal of the Geological Society of Japan 109(11): 665-608, 2003

Comparison of zeta calibration baselines for fission-track dating of apatite, zircon and sphene. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section 58(1-2): 1-22, 1985

Direct comparison of zeta calibration constants for fission-track dating by double-checking of two irradiation facilities with different degrees of neutron flux thermalization. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section 87(3-4): 147-166, 1991

Standardization of fission track dating calibration; recommendation by the Fission Track Working Group of the I.U.G.S. Subcommission on Geochronology. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section 80(2): 171-178, 1990

Etching characteristics of fission tracks in minerals, and fission track dating and calibration of zircon. Jijirhag Hoiji = Journal of the Geological Society of Korea 23(1): 32-52, 1987

Independent fission-track ages (phi -ages) of proposed and accepted apatite age standards and a comparison of phi -, Z-, zeta - and zeta (sub 0) -ages; implications for method calibration. Chemical Geology 222(3-4): 232-248, 2005

Variation of fission-track age calibration factor zeta between laboratories; possible causes and their quantitative assessment. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 17(3): 439-0, 1990

Neutron calibration for fission track dating. Atlantic Geology 26(2): 178-179, 1990

Fission-track dating; calibration results. Reunion Annuelle des Sciences de la Terre 13: 38, 1990

Fission-track dating of the porphyritic quartzic diorite and rhyolite of Ishizaka, near Otari hot spring, Kitaazumi, Nagano Prefecture; fission-track dating of igneous rocks in relation to geothermal activity in Japan. Chishitsu Chosajo Geppo = Bulletin - Japan, Geological Survey 32(12): 717-721, 1981

Progress in interlaboratory calibration of fission track dating. 1981

Calibration of fission-track dating; a laboratory experiment. Bollettino della Societa Geologica Italiana 110(2): 207-215, 1991

Fission track dating calibration; a further step towards consensus?. Terra Cognita 6(2): 140, 1986

Evaluation of calibration techniques for fission track dating. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 17(3): 409-0, 1990