+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Time consumption of planting after partial harvests



Time consumption of planting after partial harvests



Silva Fennica 42(1): 49-61



Partial harvesting combined with underplanting may be a means to reduce the risk of regeneration failure when e.g. unfavourable microclimatic conditions or severe damage by bark-feeding insects may be expected after clear-cutting, and to maintain or establish certain stand structures or tree species mixture. In this study, we performed time studies of manual planting with and without prior site preparation (patch scarification, inverting) in partially harvested stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). The harvest treatments included basal area removals of approx. 35, 45, and 55%, and a patch clear-cut treatment that was assumed to provide the same conditions for planting as conventional clear-cutting. Site preparation had a much larger influence on time consumption plant(-1) (main time) than the harvest treatment. The lowest time consumption was found with inverting and the highest without site preparation. The time spent on walking between planting spots increased with decreasing harvest intensity, reflecting a lower density of planted seedlings in the partially harvested stands. A corresponding increase in main time per plant only occurred after site preparation, since the time spent on clearing the planting spot (removal of logging residue and humus) on untreated plots was higher at the higher harvest strengths. The variation in time consumption attributed to the six replicate stands was large and mainly due to the difference among stands planted by different workers.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 022014240

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Planting after partial felling - time consumption and biological results. Forskning fra Skog og Landskap (3): 33-38, 2007

Time and energy consumption in planting.. Allg. Forst- u. Jagdztg, 134: 9, 244-54, 1963

Two harvests from one planting. Highlights of agricultural research Alabama Agricultural Experiment Stationng 28(1): 5, 1981

2 harvests from 1 planting. Highlights of agricultural research Alabama Agricultural Experiment Stationng 28(1): 5, 1981

Studies on the inprovement of plant type for the dense planting of soybean. 3. effect of planting density and planting pattern in different planting time of the growth, grain yield and canopy of soybean cultivars. Soul Taehakkyo Nonghak Yonku College of Agriculture Bulletin 1(2): 45-60, 1976

Planting density of potatoes for producing two harvests per season. Agrotekhnika i semenovodstvo kartofelia: 30-33, 1974

Effect of planting time on the performance of two cultivars of gladiolus. II. Influence of planting time on the vegetative growth and spike yield. Advances in Agricultural Research in India 8: 57-61, 1997

Effect of planting time on the performance of two cultivars of gladiolus. III. Influence of planting time on corm and cormel production. Advances in Agricultural Research in India 9: 51-53, 1998

Effect of planting distance and number of harvests on yellow tobacco cv. Speight G-28. Ciencia y Tecnica en la Agricultura, Tabaco 7(2): 55-70, 1984

Water consumption of crops for producing two three harvests per year. Gidrotekhnika i melioratsiia: 3 73-76, 1976

Problem of dwindling harvests with continually rising consumption. Allgemeine deutsche Weinfachzeitung: 107 (32) 884-886, 1971

A preliminary study on a model of three dimensional planting with 5 harvests of crops in a cotton field in the Jianghan Plains of Hubei Province. China Cottons 26(12): 24, 1999

Influence of planting date pre planting weed control irrigation and conservation tillage practices on efficacy of planting time insecticide applications for control of lesser cornstalk borer in field corn. Journal of Economic Entomology 72(2): 265-268, 1979

US proposes partial ban on Pribilof lslands fur-seal harvests. Biological Conserv 52: 152-153, 1973

Influence of partial harvests on floodwaters in a redwater system. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 77(3 Suppl. Part 2): 84, 1996