+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Visual function as measured by optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in pediatric patients with acquired demyelinating diseases



Visual function as measured by optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in pediatric patients with acquired demyelinating diseases








Accession: 022087503

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in pediatric MS. Neurology(R) Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation 4(4): E356, 2017

Optical Coherence Tomography versus Visual Evoked Potentials for Detecting Visual Pathway Abnormalities in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Clinical Neurology 14(2): 200-205, 2018

Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potentials in detecting subclinical visual impairment in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Medicine and Life 7(4): 538-541, 2014

Visual evoked potentials, contrast sensitivity and foveal optical coherence tomography in Parkinsons disease patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 127(4): e161-e162, 2016

Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without retinopathy: preliminary report. Revista de Investigacion Clinica; Organo del Hospital de Enfermedades de la Nutricion 66(4): 330-338, 2015

Correlation between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials in open-angle glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 108(5): 905-912, 2001

Evaluation of axonal optic nerve damage using visual evoked potentials and optical coherence tomography in patients with multiple sclerosis. Medicina 49(11): 474-478, 2013

Correlations between Optical Coherence Tomography, pattern ERG and Visual Evoked Potentials in patients with ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 77(Suppl. 229): 33-34, 1999

Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in healthy persons. Clinical Neurophysiology 125(5): e37-e38, 2014

Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials: which is more sensitive in multiple sclerosis?. Multiple Sclerosis 20(10): 1342-1347, 2014

Optical coherence tomography is less sensitive than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis. Neurology 73(1): 46-52, 2009

Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple Sclerosis 16(4): 412-426, 2010

Interrelationship of optical coherence tomography and multifocal visual-evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 51(5): 2770-2777, 2010

Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, static automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography findings for assessing visual pathways in patients with pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 18(5): 598-603, 2015

Assessing the damage to visual function by optical coherence tomography and the visual field test in Saddle area tumor patients. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology 48(11): 1001-1004, 2012