+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Directionality of contact networks suppresses selection pressure in evolutionary dynamics



Directionality of contact networks suppresses selection pressure in evolutionary dynamics



Journal of Theoretical Biology 258(2): 323-334



Individuals of different types, may it be genetic, cultural, or else, with different levels of fitness often compete for reproduction and survival. A fitter type generally has higher chances of disseminating their copies to other individuals. The fixation probability of a single mutant type introduced in a population of wild-type individuals quantifies how likely the mutant type spreads. How much the excess fitness of the mutant type increases its fixation probability, namely, the selection pressure, is important in assessing the impact of the introduced mutant. Previous studies mostly based on undirected and unweighted contact networks of individuals showed that the selection pressure depends on the structure of networks and the rule of reproduction. Real networks underlying ecological and social interactions are usually directed or weighted. Here we examine how the selection pressure is modulated by directionality of interactions under several update rules. Our conclusions are twofold. First, directionality discounts the selection pressure for different networks and update rules. Second, given a network, the update rules in which death events precede reproduction events significantly decrease the selection pressure than the other rules.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 024497002

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19490863

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.025


Related references

Evolutionary dynamics of West Nile virus in the United States, 1999-2011: phylogeny, selection pressure and evolutionary time-scale analysis. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases 7(5): E2245, 2013

Strategy selection in evolutionary game dynamics on group interaction networks. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 76(11): 2785-2805, 2014

Evolutionary dynamics of continuous strategy games on graphs and social networks under weak selection. Bio Systems 111(2): 102-110, 2013

Estimation of evolutionary dynamics and selection pressure in coronaviruses. Methods in Molecular Biology 1282: 41-48, 2015

Dynamics and directionality in complex networks. Physical Review Letters 103(22): 228702, 2009

Contact heterogeneity and phylodynamics: how contact networks shape parasite evolutionary trees. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases 2011: 238743, 2011

Transmission dynamics of pancreas disease (PD) in a Norwegian fjord: aspects of water transport, contact networks and infection pressure among salmon farms. Journal of Fish Diseases 37(2): 123-134, 2014

General relationship of global topology, local dynamics, and directionality in large-scale brain networks. Plos Computational Biology 11(4): E1004225, 2015

Evolutionary Dynamics of Wild Populations || Estimating Evolutionary Parameters When Viability Selection Is Operating. Proceedings Biological Sciences 275(1635): 723-734, 2008

The evolutionary advantage of cultural memory on heterogeneous contact networks. Theoretical Population Biology 129: 118-125, 2019

The evolutionary dynamics of protein-protein interaction networks inferred from the reconstruction of ancient networks. Plos one 8(3): E58134, 2013

Population dynamics in variable environments 3. evolutionary dynamics of r selection. Theoretical Population Biology 21(1): 141-165, 1982

Lumping evolutionary game dynamics on networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 407: 328-338, 2016

Variation and selection: An evolutionary model of learning in neural networks. Neural Networks 1(Supp-S1): 75-0, 1988

Geometric evolutionary dynamics of protein interaction networks. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2010: 178-189, 2010