+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels

Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels

Environmental Science and Technology 43(6): 1718-1723

Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) involves weighing trade-offs between multiple and incommensurate criteria. Current state-of-the-art LCIA tools typically compute an overall environmental score using a linear-weighted aggregation of characterized inventory data that has been normalized relative to total industry, regional, or national emissions. However, current normalization practices risk masking impacts that may be significant within the context of the decision, albeit small relative to the reference data (e.g., total U.S. emissions). Additionally, uncertainty associated with quantification of weights is generally very high. Partly for these reasons, many LCA studies truncate impact assessment at the inventory characterization step, rather than completing normalization and weighting steps. This paper describes a novel approach called stochastic multiattribute life cycle impact assessment (SMA-LCIA) that combines an outranking approach to normalization with stochastic exploration of weight spaces-avoiding some of the drawbacks of current LCIA methods. To illustrate the new approach, SMA-LCIA is compared with a typical LCIA method for crop-based, fossil-based, and electric fuels using the Greenhouse gas Regulated Emissions and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model for inventory data and the Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) model for data characterization. In contrast to the typical LCIA case, in which results are dominated by fossil fuel depletion and global warming considerations regardless of criteria weights, the SMA-LCIA approach results in a rank ordering that is more sensitive to decisionmaker preferences. The principal advantage of the SMA-LCIA method is the ability to facilitate exploration and construction of context-specific criteria preferences by simultaneously representing multiple weights spaces and the sensitivity of the rank ordering to uncertain stakeholder values.

Accession: 024615771

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19368162

DOI: 10.1021/es801123h

Related references

Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(3): 278-281, 2008

Uncertainty analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): case study on plant-protection products and implications for decision making. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(3): 184-192, 2005

Normalization in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment to Support Environmental Decision Making. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(2): 242-243, 2017

Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel. Renewable Energy 89: 578-587, 2016

A Theoretical Foundation for Life-Cycle Assessment : Recognizing the Role of Values in Environmental Decision Making. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(1): 13-28, 2000

Potential of life cycle assessment to support environmental decision making at commercial dairy farms. Agricultural Systems 131: 105-115, 2014

Combining risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate environmental aspects in environmental management system. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(7): 845-862, 2012

Life cycle assessment applied to coffee production: investigating environmental impacts to aid decision making for improvements at company level. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 1(2): 295-300, 2003

Life cycle analysis applied to the assessment of the environmental impact of alternative synthetic processes. The dimethylcarbonate case: part 1. Journal of Cleaner Production 7(3): 181-193, 1999

Decision analysis frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(4): 45-68, 2001

Limits to decision-making ability in direct multiattribute alternative evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42(2): 217-233, 1988

Comparative analysis of the environmental impact of alternative transportation fuels. Energy and Fuels 7(1): 27-32, 1993

Subjective evaluation of decision support systems using multiattribute decision making (MADM). Multiple objective decision making for land water and environmental management: proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems MODSS for Land Water and Environmental Management: Concepts Approaches and Applications 280, 1998

Family vacation decision making over the family life cycle: a decision and influence structure analysis. Journal of Travel Research 20(1): 17-23, 1981

Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnology Progress 22(4): 1012-1024, 2006