+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The biophysics of paint growth in a reversed electrostatic field; A comparison with conventional electrostatic and electrokinetic field growth responses



The biophysics of paint growth in a reversed electrostatic field; A comparison with conventional electrostatic and electrokinetic field growth responses



Int J Biometeorol 19(2): 135-146



The growth of sweet corn and bush bean plants in a reversed electrostatic field (soil positive) was investigated with reference to previous data for growth in a conventional electrostatic field (soil negative) and an electrokinetic (a.c. [alternate current]) field. Plant and leaf tip damage was observed for high potential gradients in the reversed field. Spectroscopic analyses of the damaged plant sections revealed micro-chemical activity essentially identical to that observed for conventional electrostatic and electrokinetic field growth. While the plant and leaf polarities for all 3 modes of electrification were found to be essentially consistent, the severity of leaf damage for identical field conditions was less for plants grown in the reversed electrostatic field as compared with conventional field growth. Leakage currents were also higher in the reversed field environments. It appears that plant growth responses are influenced, to a large extent, by the magnitude of active current flow. A summarization of all existing data indicated that plant growth in an electric field, regardless of mode (static or dynamic) is generally retarded at leakage currents in excess of 10-5 amp, and may be stimulated for currents of 10-8 amp. Current levels of 10-16 amp and lower appeared to have no measureable effect on the plant.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 025691969

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

The biophysics of plant growth in a reversed electrostatic field : a comparison with conventional electrostatic and electrokinetic field growth responses. Int. J. Biomet, 10: 2, 135-46. Bibl. 7, 1966

Biophysics of plant growth in an electrostatic field. Nature 206(4983): 467-470, 1965

Growth responses of tomato to seed and seedling exposure to electrostatic field. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 53(11): 962-970, 1983

The energetic balance of the two different electrostatic processes: Electrostatic liquid spraying and electrostatic induction for electrical field measuring. Journal of Electrostatics 67(2-3): 209-214, 2009

Electrostatic interactions in proteins calculations of the electrostatic term of free energy and the electrostatic potential field. European Biophysics Journal 17(5): 287-297, 1989

The fundamentals of electrostatic spinning. III. The behavior of textile fibers and randomization of their positions relative to each other in the electrostatic field zone of an electrostatic spinning machine. 1977

Different electrostatic descriptors in comparative molecular field analysis: A comparison of molecular electrostatic and coulomb potentials. Journal of Computational Chemistry 17(11): 1296-1308, 1996

Effect of an electrostatic field on growth of potato. Kerteszeti Egyetem Kozlemenyei 1986; 48(16): 19-26, 1984

Influence of soil electrostatic field on the growth and development of rice. Acta Pedologica Sinica 25(2): 199-203, 1988

Species variation in the electrostatic field of plastocyanin Implications for the electrostatic docking with cytochrome f. Biophysical Journal 70(2 PART 2): A356, 1996

A mathematical model of electrostatic field in wires-plate electrostatic precipitators. Journal of Electrostatics 39(1): 1-21, 1997

Response of wood particles in an electrostatic field - mechanism of electrostatic orientation. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Development of Wood Science, Wood Technology and Forestry, ICWSF 2001, Ljubljana, Slovenija, 5-7 September 2001: 125-132, 2001

Electrostatic field calculation using R-functions and the method of characteristics in electrostatic precipitator. Journal of Electrostatics 38(4): 269-282, 1996

Some techniques on electrostatic separation of particle size utilizing electrostatic traveling-wave field. Journal of Electrostatics 66(3-4): 220-228, 2008

Numerical model of electrostatic field in electrostatic charged spray. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 10(4): 91-95, 1994