EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The direct perception of X-rays by the human visual sense






Vision Res 4(3/4): 251-296

The direct perception of X-rays by the human visual sense

Quantum statistical calculations were made to determine the energy conversion during direct visibility of X-rays. The experiments concern the voltage range between 70 and 100 kV. During the summation time about 50 X-ray quanta are needed for the visibility threshold. The laws of Ricco, Bunsen and Roscoe, Graham and Margaria, i.e. concerning the influence of area and time of stimulation, were also confirmed for direct X-ray perception. The summation time is in the range of 40 msec. The biological Schwarzschild exponent calculated by M. Monje for visible light (0.7 for larger and 0.5 for smaller stimulus areas) also exists for direct X-ray perception. In order to produce a constant effect in a single retinal element, a somewhat lower energy is needed than that given in a single X-ray quantum of 0.4 A. For all calculations of reginal energy conversion in the X-ray range, the photoelectrical model of Autrum and Esper is very useful. Such a model is also helpful in estimating formal exposured areas.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 025730053



Related references

Direct perception of x-rays by the human eye. Vision Research 4(3): 251-269, 1964

Multistability in perception: binding sensory modalities || United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 367(1591): 932-941, 2012

Subjective visual vertical perception and sense of smell in Parkinson disease. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 49(6): 961-969, 2013

Effect of the sense of smell on the visual field, light perception and ocular tension. Bollettino Delle Malattie Dell'orecchio, Della Gola, del Naso 75(4): 319-330, 1957

United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367(1591): 932-941, 2012

In search of a genuine history of visual perception (on David c. Lindberg's John Pecham and the science of optics; NICHOLAS PASTORE'S Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception: 16501950; and WILLEM VAN HOORN'S As Images Unwind. Ancient and Modern Theories of Visual Perception. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 10(2): 264-268, 1974

Reflection qualities of butterfly wings and the role of ultraviolet rays in the visual perception of insects. Biofizika 2(3): 358-368, 1957

Further Studies On Direct And Reverse Masking Properties In The Functioning Of Sense Organs. On Biophysical Aspects Of The Relationship Between Stimulation, Excitability And Perception. Nervnaia Sistema 129: 71-75, 1963

Is a theory of direct visual perception adequate?. Psychological Bulletin 77(4): 246-261, 1972

Note on Gibson's direct visual perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills 58(2): 540-542, 1984