+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Total porosity and random roughness of the interrow zone as influenced by tillage



Total porosity and random roughness of the interrow zone as influenced by tillage



Us Dep Agr Conserv Res Rep 7: 1-21



Total porosity and random roughness were estimated for the area between 40-in. corn rows (the interrow). These estimates were developed and tested in tillage experiments conducted on Barnes-Aastad, Nicollet-Webster, and Kranz-burg-Poinsett soil associations in western Minnesota and eastern South Dakota. The tillage treatments were chosen to give a wide variation of total porosity and random roughness. The total porosity is the inches of porosity per initial 0- to 6-in. layer of soil, and random roughness is an index of the microvariations of elevation of the soil surface in an interrow area where there are no directional tillage tool marks. Large and statistically significant differences in total porosity occurred between a freshly plowed and a plowed-disked-harrowed interrow area. The freshly plowed surface had a greater porosity in the majority of trials. However, the opposite result was observed consistently in the Kranzburg-Poinsett and in some cases in the Nicollet-Webster and Barnes-Aastad associations. Much of the difference in porosity resulting from the freshly plowed and plowed-disked-harrowed treatments was explained by the soil moisture content at tillage time in relation to the moisture content at the lower plastic limit. Disking and harrowing decreased the porosity when performed on soil in the friable or harsh range of consistency, but increased the porosity when performed on soil in the plastic range of soil consistency. Hence, in row-crop tillage the interrow total porosity cannot be completely specified by the tillage operation, but is greatly affected by the soil type and soil moisture content at tillage time. The random roughness following preplanting tillage was usually associated with the type of tillage treatment. There was evidence that the previous crop affected the random roughness of the plowed interrow areas but did not significantly affect the random roughness of the plowed-disked-harrowed interrow areas. Frequently, the random roughness index value for spring-plowed interrow areas and the interrow areas that were spring plowed, disked, and harrowed was not different from the value for untilled soil at the end of the growing season. This agreement occurred in 2 growing seasons during which the 2 tillage treatments were each sequentially the same. Usually the total porosity resulting from these treatments was greater than the total porosity of the untilled soil at the end of the growing season, but at the end of each growing season there was little difference between treatments involving spring plowing. In an investigation consisting of 2 years of tillage following alfalfa, 2 seasons of the same tillage did not give additive effects on total porosity.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 025996962

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Plow-layer porosity and surface roughness from tillage as affected by initial porosity and soil moisture at tillage time. Soil Sci Soc Amer Proc 31(4): 551-556, 1967

Infiltration as influenced by tillage-induced random roughness and pore space. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am 33: 449-452, 1969

Infiltration as influenced by tillage induced random roughness and pore space alfalfa d brome grass m minnesota usa. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 33(3): 449-452, 1969

Corn (Zea mays L.) root configuration as influenced by some row-interrow variants of tillage and straw mulch management. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings. 35: 6, 974-980, 1971

Overwinter random roughness changes for four tillage practices. Paper, American Society of Agricultural Engineers (84-2506): 12 pp, 1984

Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness. Paper, American Society of Agricultural Engineers (86-2014): 31, 1986

Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness: a review. Soil and Tillage Research 9(1): 1-20, 1987

Random roughness and macroporosity in tillage systems and their influence on soil environment. Publication, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, ARS NC (57): 8-12, 1977

Soil porosity and water infiltration as influenced by tillage methods. Soil and Tillage Research 89(2): 210-220, 2006

Chemical transport below the root zone as influenced by tillage practice. Clean water clean environment 21st century: team agriculture working to protect water resources Volume 3: practices, systems and adoption Proceedings Kansas City, Missouri, USA, 5-8 March 1995: 109-112, 1995

Denitrification below the crop rooting zone as influenced by surface tillage. Journal of Environmental Quality 18(1): 12-16, 1989

Hydraulic roughness coefficients as affected by random roughness. Transactions of the ASAE 34(3): 897-903, 1991

Combined interrow tillage. Khlopkovodsto 5 15-17, 1975

Effect of interrow tillage on th. Pochvoznanie i agrokhimiia = Soil science and agrochemistry5(1): 92-98, 1980

A new method for constraining total porosity; the new total porosity-electrical resistivity upper bound. The Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK) 25(6): 714-719, 2006