+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Wisconsin pheasant movement study, 1936-37



Wisconsin pheasant movement study, 1936-37



Jour Wildlife Management 2(1): 3-12



Wild pheasants trapped in winter from managed refuges may be cheaper and better than artificial reared pheasants for replenishing understocked range. 210 pheasants were trapped, marked, and released under selected conditions in southern Wisconsin during Jan., 1937. Where food and cover were good and coverts of ample size, there was no dispersion; where food was good but coverts small and scattered, the released birds held well in some instances, but in other plantings they (and also the resident birds) adopted a circuit type of ranging similar to that of the large carnivores; where food and cover were both poor, dispersion was immediate and complete. Heavy pre-existing population density did not clearly accelerate dispersal of released birds from good well-fed cover. Heavy pre-existing population density further increased by releases seemed to increase the predation rate. There was no clear topographic orientation in the movement of released birds, but birds released on poor cover within sight of good cover promptly moved to it. Birds released on good upland cover within sight of good lowland cover moved to the lowland. There were no returns to home range except by accident. Crop damage near refuges, once started, may continue despite stringent reduction in density of pheasants. The study disclosed an unexplained difference in weight of pheasants from the 2 areas trapped. In general, the Ohio plan is admirably adapted to that transition period in which the farmer, while willing to help feed, is still inclined to let the state worry about winter cover. Under that plan the pheasants are wintered where cover happens to exist and then artificially redistributed so as to stock summer and fall range which would otherwise be vacant. This reduces spring congestion and crop damage. It is an artificial system but less so than the dependence on pen propagation toward which most States are steadily drifting.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 026103197

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/3796138


Related references

1936 Pheasant nesting study. Wilson Bulletin 49: 91-95, 1937

Seasonal movement, winter habitat use, and population distribution of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population. Technical Bull Dep nat Resour Wisc 76: 1-56, 1974

The ecology of a Wisconsin pheasant population. 1971

Food habits of the pheasant in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Conserv Bull 5(4): 10-13, 1940

Population turnover on a Wisconsin pheasant refuge. Jour Wildlife Management 7(4): 383-394, 1943

Reproduction of an east central Wisconsin pheasant population. Technical Bull Dep nat Resour Wisc 85: 1-70, 1975

An evaluation of pheasant stocking through the day-old-chick program in Wisconsin. Wis Conserv Dept Tech Bull 28: 1-84, 1963

Reproduction of an east central wisconsin usa pheasant population. Wisconsin Department Of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin: 70, 1975

Electric fencing for duck and pheasant production in wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin (176): 1-19, 1992

Channel morphology and sedimentation in Pheasant Branch near Middleton, Wisconsin. U S, 1980

Pheasant hunting and management on Wisconsin licensed shooting preserves. Dissertation Absts 20(3): 832, 1959

Feed grain program related to pheasant production in Wisconsin. J Wildlife Manage 30(3): 612-617, 1966

Crowing counts as indices to cock pheasant populations in Wisconsin. J Wildlife Manage 30(4): 735-744, 1966

Wisconsin pheasant reproduction studies based on ovulated follicle technique. Jour Wildlife Management 15(1): 32-46, 1951

The George-Deen Act of 1936 and the "Wisconsin Plan". Pharmacy in History 23(1): 17-34, 1981