+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Relative resistance of 8 important varieties of gram cicer arietinum to pulse beetle callosobruchus chinensis



Relative resistance of 8 important varieties of gram cicer arietinum to pulse beetle callosobruchus chinensis



Indian Journal of Entomology 34(1): 50-51




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 027299067

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Further studies on the relative resistance of some important varieties of Bengal gram Cicer arietinum L. to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). Bulletin of Grain Technology 8(1-2): 14-17, 1970

Relative resistance of eight important varieties of gram Cicer arietinum(Linn.) to pulse beetle, callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). Indian journal of entomology: ), 34 (1) 50-51, 1973

Relative resistance of eight important varieties of gram Cicer arietinum (Linn.) to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). Indian Journal of Entomology 1973; 34(1): 50-51, 1972

Relative susceptibility of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 59(2): 135-136, 1989

Relative resistance of some important varieties of Bengal gram to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis Linn. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University 8(3): 335-338, 1971

Relative resistance of some genotypes of chickpea, Cicer arietinum L. to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Research and Development Reporter 4(2): 204-207, 1987

Relative susceptibility of some gram (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.) in storage. Legume Researchrecd 1984; 5(1): 45-48, 1982

Relative susceptibility of some gram cicer arietinum varieties to pulse beetle callosobruchus maculatus in storage. Legume Research 5(1): 45-48, 1982

The relative susceptibility of different varieties of gram (Cicer arietinum L.) to Dhora (Callosobruchus chinensis L.). Pakistan Entomologist 23(1/2): 53-56, 2001

Efficacy of some safer grain protectants against the pulse beetle callosobruchus chinensis infesting stored bengal gram cicer arietinum. PKV Research Journal 9(1): 53-55, 1985

Resistance in Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.) to the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Entomological Research (New Delhi) 18(3): 241-247, 1994

Evaluation of some edible plant oils as protectants of chickpea Cicer arietinum L. against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Journal of Insect Science 6(2): 267-273, 1993

Studies of plant oils as surface protectants against pulse beetle callosobruchus chinensis l. in chickpea cicer arietinum l. in india. Tropical Pest Management 36(3): 314-316, 1990

Relative resistance of some black gram varieties (Phaseolus mungo L.) to the pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.). Bulletin of Grain Technology 16(2): 141-143, 1978

Studies on genetic resistance in chickpea cicer arietinum l. to bruchid beetle callosobruchus chinensis l. attack. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 34(11): 449-452, 1991