+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Detection of periodontal defects by conventional and subtraction radiography

Detection of periodontal defects by conventional and subtraction radiography

Connecticut Dental Student Journal 7: 23-24

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 028067615

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3297358

Related references

The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 16(6): 335-341, 1989

Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects. Journal of Periodontology 75(8): 1145-1149, 2004

Clinical comparison of digital subtraction radiography and conventional film for detection of defects in alveolar bone. Journal of Dental Research 66(SPEC ISSUE MAR): 247, 1987

Digital subtraction radiography in assessing bone changes in periodontal defects following guided tissue regeneration. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 19(3): 208-213, 1992

Quantitative analysis of periodontal defects in a skull model by subtraction radiography using a digital imaging device. Journal of Periodontology 67(8): 763-769, 1996

Digital subtraction radiography for the detection of periodontal bone changes. Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi 31(1): 129-146, 1989

Subtraction radiography for the detection of small periodontal bone lesions. Journal of Dental Research 60(SPEC ISSUE A): 641, 1981

Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 11(6): 411-420, 1984

Detection of periodontal disease activity comparison of probing and subtraction radiography. Journal of Dental Research 69(SPEC ISSUE MAR): 142, 1990

Detection of three-walled infrabony defects by subtraction radiography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 65(1): 102-108, 1988

Agreement in recurrent caries detection with conventional and subtraction radiography. Journal of Dental Research 70(SPEC ISSUE APRIL): 435, 1991

Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection. Journal of Periodontology 71(4): 598-605, 2000

Evidence for healing of periodontal defects 5 years after conventional and regenerative therapy: digital subtraction and bone level measurements. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 29(10): 922-928, 2002

Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography and Conventional Radiography for Detection of Artificial Cancellous Bone Defects. Journal of Dentistry 12(11): 797-806, 2015

Relative patient dose in conventional radiography, tomography, multisection radiography, and radiographic subtraction. R D Moseley and J H Rust, Editors The Reduction of Patient Dose by Diagnostic Radiologic Instrumentation p 70-77, 1964