+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A rate of 125 frames/sec is sufficient for quantitative coronary angiography

A rate of 125 frames/sec is sufficient for quantitative coronary angiography

European Heart Journal 14(ABSTR Suppl. ): 216

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 029766836

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 34(5): 652-659, 2010

Variability in quantitative coronary angiography Higher precision by analysis in consecutive frames. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 0(SPEC ISSUE): 209A, 1994

Intrinsic variability in quantitative coronary angiography Enhancement by analysis in consecutive frames. European Heart Journal 14(ABSTR Suppl. ): 446, 1993

Optimizing image contrast display improves quantitative stenosis measurement in heavily calcified coronary arterial segments on coronary CT angiography: A proof-of-concept and comparison to quantitative invasive coronary angiography. Academic Radiology 21(6): 797-804, 2015

Quantitative angiography Is percent diameter stenosis sufficient to characterize progression in coronary plaques? Results of INTACT. Circulation 86(4 Suppl. 1): I661, 1992

Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 31(8): 1651-1661, 2016

Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography with intracoronary ultrasound. Can quantitative coronary angiography accurately estimate the severity of a luminal stenosis?. Angiology 60(2): 169-179, 2008

Quantitative coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty restenosis rate analysis of influencing factors. Herz 10(6): 313-320, 1985

Hybrid CT angiography and quantitative 15O-water PET for assessment of coronary artery disease: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 40(12): 1894-1904, 2014

The multi-link stent Aspirin alone, without intravascular ultrasound or quantitative coronary angiography, is sufficient if stent diameter is 35 mm or greater. European Heart Journal 19(ABST Suppl. ): 46, 1998

Elongated eccentric soft coronary plaque: major diagnostic pitfall on quantitative coronary angiography overpowered by computed tomography coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Australasian Radiology 50(3): 267-270, 2006

Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 27(5): 647-656, 2011

Contrast enhanced multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive quantitative coronary angiography in acute coronary syndrome patients-correlation and bias. Acute Cardiac Care 8(2): 99-104, 2006

A paired-comparision of the Multifunction Cardiogram (MCG) and sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to quantitative coronary angiography for the detection of relevant coronary artery obstruction (≥70%) - a single-center study of 116 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography. International Journal of Medical Sciences 8(8): 717-724, 2012

Incremental Value of Subtended Myocardial Mass for Identifying FFR-Verified Ischemia Using Quantitative CT Angiography: Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and CT-FFR. Jacc. Cardiovascular Imaging 2018, 2018