+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Analysis of the envelope waveform of the initial part of P-waves and its application to quickly estimating the epicentral distance and magnitude



Analysis of the envelope waveform of the initial part of P-waves and its application to quickly estimating the epicentral distance and magnitude



Zisin = Jishin 56(4): 351-361



We have found that the envelope waveform of the initial part of P waves changes systematically with magnitude and epicentral distance. In order to represent the envelope waveform quantitatively we introduced a simple function of the form of Bt.exp(-At). Two parameters A and B can easily be determined by the least-squares method. The parameter B defines the slope of the initial part of the P-wave envelope and A related to the amplitude growth or decay with time. When A is positive, B/(Ae) gives the maximum amplitude where e denotes the base of natural logarithm. This case is typical for small earthquakes, indicating that the initial amplitude increases sharply and decays quickly soon after the P-wave arrival. When A is negative, the amplitude increases exponentially with time. This is a characteristic of large earthquakes. We have found from the analysis of actual seismic data that log B is inversely proportional to the epicentral distance Delta even though the dispersion of data is somewhat large. This relation seems to be independent of earthquake magnitude and thus, by using this relation, we can roughly estimate the epicentral distance immediately after the P-wave arrival. Then, we can estimate the magnitude easily from the formula, similar to the conventional magnitude-amplitude relation, M = alpha .log V (sub max) +beta log B+gamma , where V (sub max) is the P-wave maximum amplitude within a given short time interval (e.g., 3 seconds) after the P-wave arrival. For M7-and M8-class earthquakes whose rupture duration reaches 10 sec or more, we need to estimate the magnitude repeatedly with time as the amplitude increases. The decrease of the parameter B with distance may be caused by anelasticity of the medium, scattering and geometrical spreading of P waves during propagation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 030065559

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.4294/zisin1948.56.4_351


Related references

A new method of quickly estimating epicentral distance and magnitude from a single seismic record. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93(1): 526-532, 2003

Relation between seismic intensity, epicentral distance and magnitude; Part 3, Empirical formula for earthquakes occurring off the Pacific Coast of eastern Japan. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute = Tokyo Daigaku Jishin Kenkyusho Iho 62(3): 289-296, 1987

Magnitude estimation from initial waveform analysis. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 67(44): 1111, 1986

Relation between seismic intensity, epicentral distance and magnitude; Part 1, Empirical formula for shallow earthquakes in Japan excluding those occurring off the Pacific coast of eastern Japan. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute = Tokyo Daigaku Jishin Kenkyusho Iho 59(2): 219-233, 1984

Relation between seismic intensity, epicentral distance and magnitude; Part 2, Empirical formula for uppermost mantle earthquakes in Japan excluding those occurring off the Pacific Coast of eastern Japan. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute = Tokyo Daigaku Jishin Kenkyusho Iho 61(4): 551-561, 1986

P-wave amplitude variation with epicentral distance and the magnitude relations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65(4): 915-926, 1975

Relations between ground motions and earthquake magnitude, focal distance and epicentral intensity. Engineering Geology 20(1-2): 143-151, 1984

Relations between ground motions and earthquake magnitude? Focal distance and epicentral intensity. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 63(51): 1261, 1982

On the relation of the deformational precursor occurrence time to earthquake magnitude and epicentral distance. Physics of the Solid Earth 30(5): 401-405, 1994

On the amplitude-epicentral distance curves of body waves. Journal of Physics of the Earth: , Pages 45-54. 1968., 1968

The relation between predominant period and epicentral distance of S-waves. Individual Studies by Participants at the International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering 11: 79-94, 1975

The variation of the angle of incidence of P waves with epicentral distance. Indian Journal of Meteorology and Geophysics 18(2): 279-284, 1967

Rapid determination of epicentral distance using P waveform recorded at single station; earthquake early warning system approach. Seismological Research Letters 78(2): 313, 2007

Earthquake magnitude-frequency, epicentral distance, and soft-sediment deformation in sedimentary basins. Sedimentary Geology 46(1-2): 67-75, 1986

New tables of angles of incidence of p waves as a function of epicentral distance. Earthquake Notes 41(2): 45-58, 1970