+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Barriers to the practice of evidence-based urology



Barriers to the practice of evidence-based urology



Journal of Urology 179(6): 2345



We investigated urologist perceptions of barriers to implementing evidence-based medicine in clinical practice. In April 2005 an Internet survey was conducted to assess American Urological Association member attitudes toward evidence-based medicine. This analysis presents the responses to an open-ended question about perceived barriers to implementing evidence-based clinical practice in urology. Two raters developed a coding scheme with 5 main categories of evidence concerns, system level factors, physician factors, patient factors and other barriers. Each rater independently assigned a category to each response. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. A total of 365 participants (72%) responded to the open-ended question, each providing up to 4 codable responses. Of the group 53% cited concerns about the evidence including the lack thereof, low quality, limited applicability and biased presentation. In addition, 37% reported system level factors such as issues of reimbursement, fear of litigation, problems with implementation, interference/bias by third parties, and expectations and attitudes of other providers as important issues. Physician factors and patient factors were further cited by 28% and 9%, respectively. In terms of the legitimacy of evidence-based medicine 9% expressed skepticism whereas 5% of respondents indicated that they saw no barriers to implementing evidence-based medicine in urology. Efforts to promote evidence-based medicine in urology should focus not only on the generation of high quality clinical research but also on its unbiased reporting and timely dissemination. Concerted efforts should be made to reduce system level factors that hinder the implementation of evidence-based care.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 030256746

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18423732

DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.109


Related references

Attitude and perceived barriers towards the practice of evidence-based urology amongst urological trainees in India. Indian Journal of Urology 35(2): 116-119, 2019

The "evidence-based practice inventory": reliability and validity was demonstrated for a novel instrument to identify barriers and facilitators for Evidence Based Practice in health care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68(11): 1261-1269, 2015

Regional evidence-based practice fellowship program: impact on evidence-based practice implementation and barriers. Clinical Nursing Research 22(1): 51-69, 2013

Evidence-based urology in practice: incorporating patient values in evidence-based clinical decision making. Bju International 105(1): 4-5, 2010

Evidence-based urology in practice: what are levels of evidence?. Bju International 103(7): 860-861, 2009

Another milestone toward a more evidence-based practice of urology. Indian Journal of Urology 27(4): 485-486, 2011

Evidence-based practice in chiropractic practice: A survey of chiropractors' knowledge, skills, use of research literature and barriers to the use of research evidence. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 22(2): 286-295, 2014

Evidence-based urology in practice: how to use PubMed effectively. Bju International 103(9): 1156-1159, 2009

Evidence-based urology in practice: publication bias. Bju International 106(3): 318-320, 2010

Evidence-based urology in practice: publication bias. Bju International 107(2): 337; Author Reply 337-8, 2011

Evidence-based urology in practice: likelihood ratios. Bju International 104(7): 892-894, 2009

Evidence-based urology in practice: the Cochrane Library. Bju International 104(8): 1048-1049, 2009

Evidence-based urology in practice: composite endpoints. Bju International 106(5): 610-612, 2010

Evidence-based urology in practice: loss to follow-up. Bju International 106(1): 24-26, 2010

Evidence-based urology in practice: when to believe a subgroup analysis?. Bju International 105(2): 162-164, 2010