+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Clinical comparison of the treponema palladium Captiao Syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay with the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption IGG assay for syphilis screening



Clinical comparison of the treponema palladium Captiao Syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay with the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption IGG assay for syphilis screening



Transfusion 37(9 SUPPL ): 57S




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 030560117

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Clinical comparison of the Treponema pallidum CAPTIA syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay with the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption immunoglobulin G assay for syphilis testing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37(10): 3233-3234, 1999

Comparison of a Treponema pallidum IgM immunoblot with a 19S fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test for the diagnosis of congenital syphilis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 59(1): 61-66, 2007

The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test for syphilis: a comparison with the Treponema pallidum immobilization test and the fluorescent treponemal antibody test. Medical Journal of Australia 1(10): 404-406, 1968

Specificity sensitivity and reproducibility among the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test the micro hem agglutination assay for treponema pallidum antibodies and the hem agglutination treponemal test for syphilis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 14(4): 441-445, 1981

Syphilis diagnosis: screening by enzyme immunoassay and variation in fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) confirmatory test performance. Medical Laboratory Sciences 49(1): 50-55, 1992

Importance of fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test in the diagnosis of syphilis comparison with classical reactions and treponema pallidum immobilization antibody test. Ceskoslovenska Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie 19(5): 225-229, 1970

Comparison of serological reactions of syphilis on 27 sera part 1 treponema pallidum hem agglutination and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption and results in part. Kyungpook University Medical Journal 18(2): 299-303, 1977

Evaluation of the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test for detection of antibodies (immunoglobulins G and M) to Treponema pallidum in serologic diagnosis of syphilis. International Journal of Std and Aids 18(4): 255-260, 2007

Treponemal and lipoidal tests in old treated syphilis. A clinical evaluation of 367 cases with special reference to the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption (FTA-ABS) test. Acta Dermato-Venereologica 48: Suppl 60:1-43, 1968

Treponemal and lipoidal tests in old treated syphilis a clinical evaluation of 367 cases with special reference to the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test human. Acta Dermato-Venereologica 48(SUPPL 60): 7-43, 1968

Markers of past syphilis in HIV infection comparing Captia Syphilis G anti-treponemal IgG enzyme immunoassay with other treponemal antigen tests. International Journal of Std and Aids 6(2): 101-104, 1995

Serological tests for syphilis human inst fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption inst treponema pallidum immobilization. Lancet (7553): 1187-1188, 1968

Comparison of treponema pallidum hem agglutination test with rapid plasma reagin card test venereal disease research laboratory test and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test in diagnosis of syphilis. Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology 20(3): 151-155, 1977

Evaluation of the fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA) test for syphilis. Comparison with Treponema pallidum immobilization (TPI) test. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 36: 105-113, 1961

Evaluation of the fluorescent treponemal antibody test for syphilis. Comparison with Treponema pallidum immobilization test. Amer Jour Clin Pathol 36(2): 105-113, 1961